Alan Watt
"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#261)

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 20, 2009:

Sneezin' Freezin' to Stormin' Warmin':

"Go Into the Past, You'll Find a Gold Mine
And Articles Like This, from Magazine 'Time,'
When the UN and Scientists had Us Believing
We were Headed Swiftly into Global Freezing,
Picked Up by Politicos, Always Charming,
Claimed, Caused by Dust Kicked Up by Farming,
Along with the Mantra Called 'Unsustainable,'
Saving the Masses was Only Attainable
By Reducing the People on the Planet,
And If Scientists were In Charge and Ran It,
There was Perhaps a Tiny Wee Chance
They'd Save a Portion Who'd Laugh and Dance,
The Fraction Surviving While the Masses Perish,
Useless Eaters and Families, Those We Cherish,
The Agenda Rolls On, Through Freezing to Warming,
Same Scientists Cry Out Predictions of Warning,
While We Who Watch Stand Back in Frustration,
Seeing Machinery Set Up for Depopulation"
© Alan Watt Feb. 20, 2009

Friday February 20th 2009

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 20, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com                            www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen

There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 20th of February 2009. 

I always advise newcomers to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and, on the website, you'll find lots of talks I've given in the past, which cover a vast array of the big system. I go into the big system in depth, in different areas; and there are so many areas to go into, to show you that the world has been planned. The future's always planned and I try and give you clues as to who's doing the planning, at least the ones that come forward and tell us, through their own think-tanks. I try and tie it together for you and show you where it's all supposed to go; and the reason it's done with all deception and subterfuge is because it's so horrific that, if the public knew, there would be an uprising across the planet. They can never tell the public the truth, because this agenda was set up an awful long time ago; and written about, by the big players, including the future vision of the world, their little utopia, where there'll be very little, or few people left on it in fact. And - definitely - not many of the masses, because we're all inferior, genetically; and they hope that, through science, they could create better slaves to serve their needs better, for the elite themselves, who, naturally will come through.  

Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of these talks, which you can download, print up, and they're written in the various languages of Europe.  

For those who listen, they're pretty-well veterans of what's been going on when they listen to shows like this; and you realise, as I say, that the world's planned in stages and the boys who understand when to implement the next step, the next stage, do so, not by sticking a pin in a paper somewhere, or a calendar, but because they understand how long it takes to condition a generation, so they will accept the next changes. It's all to do with programming the public to accept changes. It's an art, it's a scientific art, it's guaranteed to work and I always refer to Plato, who talked about this art in his book The Republic and others of his own work. He goes into it in fair depth as to how the human psychology works on the masses; and they understood thousands of years ago how to implement changes on public. If they simply went from one type system to another overnight, there would be rebellions; but, if you train one generation gradually into thinking about this new system and then gradually implementing bits of it, from all different directions, they'll eventually accept it all, without thinking.

That's how easy it is, done thousands of years ago and it's all been done again today; but, today, it's much more easier because they have not just in national education systems, they have an international education system, to ensure that everyone on the planet gets the same indoctrination, very important we all start off on the same programme. It's interesting too that - across the world right now - there are people in power, who have pretty-well vowed to end home schooling. In Italy, it was banned by an act of Parliament, because, as they said in their report, they wanted everyone to get the same indoctrination, very important for the future.

That's how the world is run, it’s by international cartels. We get glimpses of who they are (the different cartels), specialising in different areas. We see the cartels that have taken over the entire food supply of the planet for instance; and eventually that'll come down to probably one. Another one is taking over the energy supplies of the planet; and that's all they'll deal with eventually. There'll be one corporation for each special need for humanity.

Back with more - after this break. 

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. Sometimes you have to tie in the past, to bring you up to speed as to what's happening today and where it's supposed to go, because you get all these clues, down through your life, as little statements are made here and there, in different programmes on television, or in the newspapers, which don't mean much to the public at the time, because it's never really explained to the public what the politicians are really-really saying. And that's the decision of course that the media puts in, if they wanted to explain it all to you, they would, they don't want you to know what's really going on at any one time. Mind you, they'll give you lots of trivia, and detailed trivia at that; but the media is an essential arm of government, to keep us all in the dark.

Here's one article here, that ties up some of the system in which we live and where it's supposed to go and it was aired on CPAC, there's actually a video attached to it; I'll leave the link at the end of the show. That was a Cable Public Affairs Channel, February the 10th 2009.

Former Canadian Prime Minister, ‘give up a little bit of our sovereignty to make the world work’.

The overlay on the video is titled: 

“Ottawa, Global Governance and the Future of the G20”. 

Governance, again, is the United Nations term, that came into vogue a few years ago, as they changed the whole idea of Government to Governance. What they're really talking about is a new Sovietised system where NGOs will be the new democracy; they already are in fact, but that's what democracy will consist of in future: nothing but NGOs, who are funded by Think-Tanks and the big Foundations. They lobby government already, they advise government already and they bypass democracy through the system. It says here: 

Former Canadian Prime Minister, Paul Martin, 

Who was in from 2003-2006, in fact he was a lifer politician, one of these career politicians. He got in actually, because the former Prime Minister Chrétien stepped down. Martin, who’d been in government, I think his whole life, had only been missing from government for a few months, while he worked at the United Nations, walked right back to Canada and took up the position as Prime Minister. He was already primed for his role at the United Nations, where he worked. It says: 

Paul Martin, said: “What is going to happen when a Chinese hedge fund goes under? And the results of that tsunami don’t stop at the Chinese or Indian border […] Who is going to deal with that unless we are prepared to understand that in fact we are all going to give up a little bit of our sovereignty to make the world work. 

Why are we hearing that all over the place? Every article that comes along, whether it's monetary crashes or whatever: giving up your sovereignty. Terrorism: giving up your sovereignty; to make the world work. He says: 

I hope that is also something that the G20 comes to deal with. So those are the issues I got to deal with. I think that we are really at the beginning of a very different era.  

He could have said ‘New World Order’; they phrase it in different ways you see. He says: 

1944 the great minds of the world, Dexter White, John Maynard Keynes and a bunch, essentially laid the foundations Bretton Woods institutions and the United Nations. And they built a system that functioned for over 50 to 60 years. I think that it’s time to renew that vision. […] I think we’ve got to take it one step further.”  

Now, I've mentioned before that John Maynard Keynes himself said this would be Part One and that the real goal was to bring in a world of service, where every citizen would serve a world system, that's what they're talking about, right here. And so here's Martin saying they've got to take it one step further. Here's another video here too. It says:

The EU, the Economic Union, calling for a New World Governance: 

You can see Sarkozy (French President holding EU Presidency at the time) and Barroso (EU Commission President [at the time]) coming out and calling for the setup of a “New World Governance”, “New Global Order”, “Global Governance” and that crises are the perfect time to lead the public into it, 

Crises are the perfect time to lead the public into it, you see; and that's what order out of chaos is. They always do this, they set up the crises and then they herd us along in a different direction. It's all done in advance, order out of chaos.  There's a few videos on here that you can see, to do with these big people, well-know people, presidents etc, talking about the New World Order. That's for those who don't believe there is one and, strangely, there are people out there who really don't believe there's a New World Order, even though they hear it over and over; they still phone me in and ask me where to find it.  I've given quote after quote after quote, from a book recently, night after night ad nauseum and they still don't want to believe it, it's astonishing.  I'll put these links up at the end of the show, as I say; and you can see it for yourself.  

The world has been tied up by a handful of corporations. That means that everything that you need to survive, such as energy of all kinds (your fuel, your electricity, your natural gas, oil) has been taken over. The right to even have it has been taken over by people, because it's combined with government and sustainability, that's what interdependence is all about, it's a ruse to dominate every person on the planet.

You also have a few corporations, as I say, who are managing all the food of the planet; and, eventually, that will be one corporation. It probably is already, but they give the appearance of being different companies. An old trick they did with Standard Oil, when they went into deregulation. At one time, Standard Oil had the monopoly on everything and so, all they did was deregulate and set up a whole bunch of separate companies but still under the same Founder.

There's no real competition in the world right now, it's completely sewn up; and we are at the mercy of these big tycoons. It's not just about money, or power, it's about bringing in a world that was envisaged a long time ago; and these guys all believe in this vision of the world. They've tried everything: global warming, global cooling - all kinds of disasters - to terrify the public to go along with this interdependence nonsense. Remember: in the 1970s, they were on about Global Cooling and the coming Ice Age, the same scientists that are now getting their pay cheques for saying it's global warming. Now, of course, it's just weather, weather changes.  

This is from Time, Monday June the 24th 1974:  

Another Ice Age? 

In Africa, drought continues for the sixth consecutive year, adding terribly to the toll of famine victims. During 1972 record rains in parts of the U.S., Pakistan and Japan caused some of the worst flooding in centuries. In Canada's wheat belt, a particularly chilly and rainy spring has delayed planting and may well bring a disappointingly small harvest. Rainy Britain, on the other hand, has suffered from uncharacteristic dry spells the past few springs. A series of unusually cold winters has gripped the American Far West, while New England and northern Europe have recently experienced the mildest winters within anyone's recollection.

As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. 

That's how they put it across, back in the '70s. Climatic - you know - global and climatic upheaval. 

However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age. 

An Ice Age, that's how they started this whole thing off. It says here: 

Tell-tale signs are everywhere - from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest. 

They give you these farcical stories. 

Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7° F. Although that figure is at best an estimate, it is supported by other convincing data. When Climatologist George J. Kukla of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory and his wife Helena analyzed satellite weather data for the Northern Hemisphere, they found that the area of the ice and snow cover had suddenly increased by 12% in 1971 and the increase has persisted ever since. Areas of Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic, for example, were once totally free of any snow in summer; 

For those who didn't know that. 

now they are covered year round.

Scientists have found other indications of global cooling. For one thing there has been a noticeable expansion of the great belt of dry, high-altitude polar winds - the so-called circumpolar vortex - that sweep from west to east around the top and bottom of the world. Indeed it is the widening of this cap of cold air that is the immediate cause of Africa's drought. By blocking moisture-bearing equatorial winds and preventing them from bringing rainfall to the parched sub-Sahara region, as well as other drought-ridden areas stretching all the way from Central America to the Middle East and India, the polar winds have in effect caused the Sahara and other deserts to reach farther to the south. Paradoxically, the same vortex has created quite different weather quirks in the U.S. and other temperate zones. As the winds swirl around the globe, their southerly portions undulate like the bottom of a skirt. Cold air is pulled down across the Western U.S. and warm air is swept up to the Northeast. 

This is the kind of stuff they were using back in the '70s, to get this sustainable development idea across to us. Of course it didn't work out that way, so they simply changed it to global warming.

Back with more - after this break. 

=== BREAK === 

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I was going on about what the public were being fed, regarding the weather situation back in the '70s, from Time and there's a two-page article, I'll put up the links at the end of the show, to show you how they introduced it at that time; but, unfortunately, the weather did not cooperate with them, so the same scientists actually swapped hats and went off in the other direction and claimed that it was global warming that was to blame. It's amazing how they can suddenly change their points of view when they get a pay cheque that seems to be guaranteed to be fairly steady, an income. That's what runs scientists today, they all run on the same thing. 

WiseUp Journal has a good article on this particular topic. I'll give a link to that at the end of the show as well; they go into it in fairly good detail.  

Now, I have callers on the line and there’s Dale from Michigan; are you there Dale? 

Dale: Yes, Alan, can you hear me? 

Alan: Yes.  

Dale: One thing I absolutely love about your show, and I couldn't believe how fortunate I was when I found it, is that you let your mind 'go there' and so many people don't; and you consider things and I think that, through your meditation and everything, that you consider all points. I have one article, I don't know if people realise it but the Stimulus Package has billions of dollars for agencies that fund biomedical research and genomics. The other day when I called in, I wasn't suggesting that people who have RH Negative blood are from another planet or from the stars or anything like that. I'm talking about very real people here on the earth. And the whole thing about, you know, parents, could this person be my parent? They get into the subject of chimera and scientists are creating, now, chimeric pathogens and Eric Pianka talked about killing off 85% or 90% of the population and that what they needed was an airborne Ebola virus. And, through chimera, what they're trying to do is combine the common cold with diseases like AIDS and Ebola; and you know that's in the news and you can read about it and people can say well you know they intend to cull the population by 2050, but I think it's going to be much sooner than that. 

Alan: Well, you understand they've already been doing it, it's being done quietly and it's so easy to regulate. Because you can go into the scientific data, especially medical data prior to the 1950s and they had very good statistics on different diseases, cancers etc. And from 1950 onwards, we plummeted in health; we found all kinds of cancers breaking out. In fact, there's so many today, they can't even give names to them, they're so new and they've different ways of taking over. This all happened in a span of 50 years, the male fertility plummeted and I've been over the documentation. Now, when you tie it in with the statements made by the big players around the same time, like the Huxleys and the Bertrand Russell’s and so on, who talked about the necessity too; and Charles Galton Darwin who actually said they could use hormones etc, to affect children in the womb, which is exactly what's been happening. Especially with male infertility, the crucial 8-12 weeks is so important. If they could get female hormones in there at the same time, the development of the male will not really take over properly for the entire life of that person when they're born. When you tie it all together, these guys weren't just suggesting they go ahead and do this, they were actually doing it. 

It's the same with the death rate: at a time when we've supposedly got more healthcare going than any previous generation ever had, we're the sickest people of all. And, as I say, we're sterile, we're dying off with all kinds of diseases, we're fed poisons for food, even the scandal to do with the processed foods and the mercury contamination in it all, because they use mercury in the process, to process it. How can you keep that quiet for 50 years?  

Dale: Right and they just had a trial on that and they said that the people, the parents that were trying to prove that it was the mercury in the vaccines, they didn't bring in experts (!), that they only brought in people that knew what they were talking about! And I had heard, I was watching C-Span one morning and they were talking about the Thimerosal and they said that they had taken it out of the vaccines, well a nurse called in and she said “Yeah, they took that out and they put a much more potent form of mercury in instead and called it something else”. So, when they tell you they've taken it out, they don't tell you, yeah, we made it even stronger! But, what I wanted to say, you and Jackie spoke about religion and she called herself a heretic and what I was trying to get at, was the RH Negative. It's not that there's anything inherently different about RH Negative and RH Positive, but it's one of those red herrings, where they can claim that they're superior. And if you look at the Bible - and I meditate all the time - Genesis 3:15, after Eve had eaten from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, God said to Satan, he said: ‘I will put enmity between your seed and her seed’. 

Alan: Hold on a second and we'll come after this break with the same topic. 

=== BREAK ===

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to Dale; are you still there Dale? 

Dale: Yes. 

Alan: Yes, you were saying. 

Dale: I was saying the reason why the rulers of the world can claim that they believe in God and they believe in this religion is that the Bible, to me, is a book of racial hygiene for RH Negative people. The Rothschilds funded a study into geese, wingless geese, on an island that had been isolated from the rest of the world of geese for populations, which meant they inbred among their own group. And, over time, the researcher said that, over hundreds of thousands of years, they became a different species, because they couldn't breed with those other geese any longer.

If you look at the family trees of the RH Negative, they have no branches. And they were told to keep separate and to themselves. How can God say thou shalt not kill but he tells his people to go into the land of Canaan and kill every man, woman and child and without fail to do this? And how can Jesus - when one of his disciples told him 'why are you telling people the secrets?’, he says 'It'll go right over their heads, they have no idea what I'm really talking about'. I mean, what we have, you talk about the exoteric and the esoteric. I cannot believe that people go to church and they believe the simplistic thoughts and ideas that are handed out to them, week after week; and I'm not trying to put them down, you know, it's a social thing that they do. But, if they really knew what it's talking about. 

Alan: Well, in this world, the bottom line in the world is there can be no people who are superior over others and I don't care if they do it in politics or whatever or whatever reason is given, the fact is we cannot live in a world where people claim to be superior. You will see the same thing, as I say, with Germany. At one time, they had the master plan for the master race and all this kind of stuff and they persecuted peoples; but, then again, you see the same people who are persecuted doing the same thing in the Middle East. And so the technique, and I always say: if something walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, you know. Anybody who puts people behind barbed wire and uses them as a labour force, basically, is a Nazi. Because that's what that is. 

Dale: And they're a big snake, if you look at the way they act, it's like we'll talk and talk and talk and, in the meantime, we'll kill thousands more Palestinians. 

Alan: You've got to understand too, there's Geopolitics here. Because every country in the Western world has backed Israel; and don't confuse Judaism with Israel, because there's one hell of a history behind Israel and who actually came into it, to begin with.  Rothschild told a lot of the farmers, who came there in the late 1800s to settle, and they asked for permission to do different things, and he told them, he says: you will do no such thing, he says Israel is mine. He says Israel is mine; and then you find out too, again from reading the ones who set up Israel, like Storrs, who was the governor general, on behalf of the British royalty. He said that most of them came in from Russia and they were actually hardened communists, it was a communist ideology which drove them. That's why they brought the Kibbutzes in and many of them said that the reason they moved out of the Soviet Union was that the Soviet Union was not communistic enough. They set up the Kibbutzes, under the Platonic idea of separating children from parents, at birth, so there'd be no affection to parents and no adhesion to people who were contaminated.

There was a communist doctrine there at the beginning; however, with the West Geopolitical strategy - and it's often said at the top, even in Washington, that Israel is really just a State, a tool of Washington, because they needed someone in the Middle East to set up problems. They did not want a united Arab federation to deal with in the Middle East; and so they had to put someone in there that would keep the pot boiling, basically; and that's what's happened. That's why the countries are silent on it, it's because it's part of long-term geopolitical strategy. They knew, all the countries in the world, that were in on this global agenda, a long time ago, starting from Britain, knew that they would never ever destroy or convert a Muslim population that had united federations. They would be too strong, they would not go along with democracy, they've never known what democracy is; and, mind you, they functioned well enough without it, but it was intended that everyone would get forced under the hammer of democracy. Democracy, as you know, is a rubber band, it's very elastic, it can be redefined, as years go on; and that's why they set up Israel there. However, never confuse an elitist plan with Judaism, because the average Jew doesn't know what's going on either. 

Dale: I know and you've mentioned that the experiments they did with the Sephardic and Hasidic Jews, where they bombarded children with radiation and so many of them died, it's not like they have a love for Jewish people.  

Alan: What they've got here, and I'll maintain this, you know, I really maintain this, at the top of the world, you have people who can guide whole peoples, they are aristocratic. They don't care if they're sitting on the throne of England or pretending to be the leaders of Israel, you have an aristocracy, a small aristocracy, guiding the whole world's populations right now; and they don't care what camouflage they go under. You’ll find, at the end of all of this, that they're none of what we thought they were, none of them are the people we thought they were. 

Dale: Right. What I do get, you like Monty Python, the anarcho-syndicalist when the woman says there's some lovely silt over here Dennis. I look at a lot of different things and a lot of them, I totally write off, a lot of things there's truth mixed with lies. But I will research and I will find incredible knowledge, you know a whole new line of thought when I look at something. John Stewart had on his programme; you're up in Canada, that the Prime Minister suspended Parliament. 

Alan: That's right. 

Dale: With the blessing of the queen and there is, I found out on a video, it's like the queen when she's inaugurated, she has the emblems of Egypt, you know, all the emblems, you know, the rod and the staff of the good shepherd. 

Alan: They go all the way back to Nimrod, the symbols there, even with the chequered floor, go all the way back to Nimrod, including the ermine gown she wears. 

Dale: And The Great Work, like you say. We figure we're going to live maybe 90 years if we're incredible lucky but these people, they're working toward something. They are like a beehive and that kind of mentality I don't understand at all.

Alan: Well, it's a separate religion, it's a religion that's never been explained to the public, it's in no holy book that's given to anybody but it is a definite religion. I mean Rockefeller's 94 and here he is, down at the various Summits of the Americas, he's financing all of them; and he's just as enthusiastic today as he was when he was in his 20s. That doesn't happen normally. Normally, your views and your opinions will change as you get older and you lose some steam, but these people have to be religious fanatics; what is their religion? That's the whole thing.

Thanks for calling and I'll try one more caller here, there's one more caller waiting; and we'll go onto Tony from Florida, are you there Tony? 

Tony: Hiya Alan. 

Alan: Yes. 

Tony: OK. I'm going to say what I'm going to say. You're not on GCN, you're on RBN, you're not on Alex Jones; you're on a different network. And I know you're going to take this as a hostile call and it's not, OK? Because everything you say is the truth; but there's one missing link on what you say. I'm just going to be candid with you, if you want to hang up on me, fine. 

Alan: I'm listening, if you just get on with it. 

Tony: I'm going to get on with it, what you need to do is get out of Ontario, Canada, and come down to the United States and get into a free-speech zone, get into a free-speech zone because you know what? You have the missing link and you talked about this lady and you just don't want to say it because you're under law up there and you know what I'm talking about. You go on and on about the New World Order, you will not mention the Jew. I'm sorry - look, hang up on me now. 

Alan: What I will say is: don't think that all of them at the top are Jewish. 

Tony: That's my difference of opinion with you. I respect you, I respect you. 

Alan: What I'll agree with you on: is that for years, running the US system, especially, for a minority group in the world, you have way too many of one type running your country; and that's obvious to the world, it's also obvious to people across the world, including the Arabs who are wondering who runs the US. There's no doubt about that. There's a minority here, now they may claim they're atheistic in their beliefs. It's true the New American Century crowd were heavily involved with shaping the whole policies for the US over the Bush era. We know who all those members were; we know that Leo Strauss was the man who came up with those policies, who also came up with the policies of a myth for the age, using fear tactics and all the rest of it, to control populations. With that part, I will agree; but you'll find, at the end of all of this, that they're not who they say they are either. As I say, there's another religion above all of this; and these characters will hide behind all kinds of religion. If I wanted to really-really be secretive, I would put people in the front who will take the heat while I’d be a different species altogether, that's how I would do it.

Tony: I'll just say I am not hostile to you, I think you need to get out of Ontario and come down here. 

Alan: I don't have to; you see we're merging with you!  

Tony: I'm not being hostile to you one bit. Do you really feel that you have total freedom of what you have to say, and you’ve been going on for hours and hours and hours, if you feel, sir, that you have it then you say it and I'll respect it. That when you're sitting there in Ontario, Canada, you can blow it all out and you have no fear? 

Alan: Oh, I tell you, absolutely, in Canada, you have so many restrictions on where you can go, even if you've got legitimate questions to ask, you cannot ask those questions. Questioning something can get you in big trouble. If you were a child in fact, asking questions, and every child should be allowed to ask any question they wish, you'd still be in trouble. 

Tony: That's what I'm saying. I think you should just get out of there and come down, what 200 miles, 150 miles? And then you could do with everything you want to say; and then at that point in time, fine, I would have no qualms with you and I don’t Alan, I don't want to be hostile to you, you're on RBN, I made my point ok? 

Alan: Ok.  

Tony: I just think you should come down to a free-speech, 150 miles, get out of there! 

Alan: I'll definitely think about it; but remember, we're merging with you totally by 2010 - we've only got one year to go.  Thanks for calling though. 

That's what you really have, as I say, you can't really talk openly about any single thing, no matter how legitimate the questions may be, you will be hammered for it. However, at the same time too, don't ever be misled by what's thrown in front of you to see. People who want to remain secretive will always have front men, in every government; and, in fact, that's what governments really are comprised of. They're front men, they're picked out and coached as to their roles for their terms in office; and, of course, if you truly wanted one people to take the blame, you would certainly put in people who seem to represent them. We've got to be very-very-very careful here, because there's more to it than meets the eye, much more to it.  

Here's an article here from www.opednew.com to do with the food and how they're going after the food now. February the 12th 2009, it says: 

Monsanto in Illinois: Homeland Security and USDA plan attacks against animals

Below is a letter to livestock producers in Illinois asking them and others to contact the Governor's office to ask to be allowed to be present at a meeting between Homeland Security and the USDA which involves NAIS and "surge capacity" under Homeland Security to attack and seize and destroy - "depopulate" an area of - animals.  This meeting is about what will be done TO THEM but they are shut out.   

So, the people who will be involved, all the farmers and so on, aren't allowed into this meeting. It says: 

Many of you already know about Monsanto's "rural cleansing" in southern Illinois of 200 - 400 farmers for using Steve Hixon as their seed cleaner.  One is being sued for $400,000.  Do the math.  In 2006, Monsanto made $160,000,000 in this Mafia-like extortion....Many of you already know that Monsanto was involved in the development of NAIS which, to me, appears to be the set up on the animal side, to do what Monsanto has done with seeds - eliminate normal animals and substitute genetically engineered animals. 

Which, of course, Monsanto has the patent on. 

I've written about how Homeland Security is set to military type warrant-less raids against farms to seize and destroy animals crops and equipment using "animal disease" as the excuse - no due process, no means of checking to see if any of the animals are fine, no way to stop the slaughter.  I've also written how the USDA has already proved it operates this way. Homeland Security is the centralization of power bequeathed to us by Bush's "War on Terror," something many believe was not based on an enemy attack at all.  Amnesty International is calling for an elimination of laws that were passed under Bush's "War on Terror" justification.  NSA-spying is one such abuse.  

NAIS is NSA-spying on steroids - imagine paying for the equipment used to spy on you, yourself, having to keep it up, having to let the government know in advance of every move your animals make (a trail ride, for instance, your child bringing a pet chicken to school), and to have to file paperwork within 24 hours afterwards or face penalties so draconian, the second infraction if your chicken crosses the road and you fail to report it on time, is $500,000.  

NAIS is backed up by Homeland Security.  Both are connected to Monsanto and, as is typical of Monsanto, both are resulting in terror for farmers. 

And it's true enough, farmers now are terrified, not just about this but about the seeds, the altered seeds blowing or getting into their fields by birds pooping, as happened in Canada, supposedly. The judges have already said that ‘We don't care how it's on your land; it's on your land and therefore you're out of business’. Monsanto always wins.  

Food and Water Watch, the Organic Consumers Association, the Center for Food Safety, Public Citizen, the Campaign for Liberty, Amnesty International, the ACLU, and every farming, food, anti-GMO, animal rights, economic justice groups in this country must come together and with many other organizations, to need to demand NAIS be eliminated entirely.   

And they should, before it's too late.

Back with more - after this break. 

=== BREAK === 

Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I should mention, before I go onto this next article, if I've got time, that you can help support me by going into the website www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you'll find lots of talks I've given there you can download for free; also you can buy those items I have for sale, that keeps me going and you can donate as well, if you'd like, the buttons on the site www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com

Getting back to this global cooling scam they tried to pull in the 1970s before they found it was easier to warm the planet through the aerial spraying. It says here, this is from WiseUp Journal, again, from the '70s. He's taken extracts from these two articles from Time Magazine. It says here: 

“Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend. 

This was what they were telling us in the '70s. 

The University of Wisconsin’s Reid A. Bryson and other climatologists suggest that dust and other particles released into the atmosphere as a result of farming 

Ha-ha! 

and fuel burning may be blocking more and more sunlight from reaching and heating the surface of the earth. “Whatever the cause of the cooling trend, its effects could be extremely serious, if not catastrophic. Scientists figure that only a 1% decrease in the amount of sunlight hitting the earth’s surface could tip the climatic balance, and cool the planet enough to send it sliding down the road to another ice age within only a few hundred years. 

I wonder if that's why they're spraying it all? They've already admitted from NASA there's less sunlight hitting the planet; they just don't mention it's because of all the spraying. 

“University of Toronto Climatologist Kenneth Hare, a former president of the Royal Meteorological Society, believes that the continuing drought and the recent failure of the Russian harvest gave the world a grim premonition of what might happen. Warns Hare: ‘I don’t believe that the world’s present population is sustainable 

There you are: this is the 1970s. 

if there are more than three years like 1972 in a row.’”

When they claimed it was cooling. You see, it's the same hype they were giving back then, only they were blaming the cooling for it. It says here: 

Strange how the 70’s experienced a cooling period after industrial age decades of “fossil fuel” burning, isn’t it? Only strange if you believe more man-made CO2 will burn up the planet, or cool it depending on the political climate of the day. The agenda does not change with the weather. What is the decades old political ideology of the climate agenda? In 1976 members of a respected think tank  

Leading scientists and so on.   

co-authored a report titled Reshaping the International Order  

It has the ISBN number for those who want to read it: 0-525-04340-3 

which stated, “although not yet proven, climatologists are being forced to conclude that our planet has in recent times passed through a period which may well have been optimal as far as food production is concerned.”  

That's as far back as 1976, when they were planning to take over the food supply then, in fact, they were already in the process of it. 

In another report by the same group from 1991, The First Global Revolution  

I've mentioned that many times 

...they wrote, “in searching for a new enemy to unite us all,

All of humanity against a common cause.

we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.  

Fit the bill - for those who don't believe it, I keep repeating the same little statement from the Club of Rome, who wrote The First Global Revolution. That would fit the bill to get us working together towards this great utopia that we, who are alive now, will never see, never see, because there are no utopias, only hells when these guys are in charge.  

Well, that's it for tonight. So, from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight; and may your God (or your gods) go with you.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Transcribed by Bill Scott.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Topics of show covered in following links:

"Former Canadian Prime Minister, 'give up a little bit of our sovereignty to make the world work' (Video)" (wiseupjournal.com) - Feb. 20, 2009.

"Another Ice Age?" Time Magazine (time.com) - June 24, 1974.
    Part 1         Part 2

"1974 Times Magazine Article on Global Cooling and More" (wiseupjournal.com) - Feb. 20, 2009.

"Monsanto in Illinois: Homeland Security and USDA plan attacks against animals" by Linn Cohen-Cole (opednews.com) - Feb. 12, 2009.