July 24th, 2009 (#371)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt July 24th, 2009:

The Peter Pan Syndrome:

"Standardized World with No Variety,
Lifelong Children, Controlled Society,
Past Regimes Can't Match in Knavery,
This System Where Slaves Love Their Slavery,
Toys are Cheap, Lavish Entertainment,
We're All On Board, Technique Entrainment,
No Need to Reason, Experts de Rigueur,
Life's Mysterious to Those Who Can't Figure,
Live for Fun, Leave Problems to Experts,
Like Those of Kinsey, Weirdoes, Perverts,
And While We're Playing, Time Passes, in Trance,
We Follow Pied Pipers Living on Grants"
© Alan Watt July 24th, 2009

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - July 24th, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

alternate sites:
cuttingthroughthematrix.net  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 24th of July, 2009.  Newcomers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, and you'll find on the front page, lots of other sites I have there which are all backups you might say, but you should bookmark them just in case the main servers go down again, because it's happened in the past, and then you'll have other sites you can look into and download the latest shows from.  As I say, there's cuttingthrough.jenkness.com, you'll see that on the front page.  You'll see cuttingthroughthematrix.net, .us, .ca, alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca, and alanwattsentientsentinel.eu.  That last one is a European site that also carries the same audios of all the shows I've done on the radio, and it also has a lot of transcripts of these talks, for print up, and they're in the various languages of Europe.  Now you bring me to you.  You are the listeners, you bring me to yourself, and there's no doubt about it, that so much that's been given out on this particular program over the years ends up going across the world like wildfire, and many people pick up on this information, because prior to really me talking about the big picture of the world, and the organizations that worked this world into where it was going – I've showed you how it was made to go in a certain direction by big foundations and so on – Patriot Radio was stuck down on a sort of navel-gazing of the past, and very localized laws, etc.  They didn't see what was happening in the world around them.  They didn't see the big movements of the internationalists, and the foundations, many of them living right in the United States.  This show really has been on the cutting edge, and many websites up there, simply take all of the stuff that's spoken about here, look into the links I give them, and put it up onto their own sites.  So it really has taken off very, very well, and it's influenced a lot of people for positive change to the truth, and getting more of the truth maybe for the first time, not just left-right and so on, but the big picture that's way above all of that.  So if you like what's happening, you can help keep me going by buying what I have for sale on the cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, or you can donate to me through paypal, or personal check for the U.S. and Canada, Western Union outside of Canada and the States, and MoneyGram is also okay, and some people just send cash, just to let you know, that keeps me going, because it's not for free.  I have to eat here as well, I've got my own taxes, the property taxes in my area went up four-fold, for rural taxes for Ontario, four-fold in the one year.  To sell this dump I live in, I'd have to sell it for a quarter of what the government's claiming it was worth, because I couldn't sell it for what they say it is, but they can tax you on that.  So I need money too, just to get along, as we go through these big times of clearing the rural areas out, that's what it's all about really, and you've got to help me out as well.  Plus, it costs me for satellite uploads and all the rest of it, for this show, to give you this stuff for free.  And those who can afford it, help those who can't afford it, because everyone's getting this for free out there.  Lots of people truly can't afford it.  Other ones certainly could, and can, and they donate to other sites, so why not mine as well?  It's time to divvy up, and help out.  You can also write to me [listed above].  Back with more, after the following break. 


Hi folks, this is Alan Watt, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, once in a while I'll let that guitar rift just yell and scream along there because that's how sometimes you feel.  You feel like screaming or yelling at the Big System that's open and in front of our faces now.  It's not so much what's happening in the world, it's the fact that we're treated like children.  And every law that gets put on the books across the Western World, rapidly expands to what some of us always knew would be their goals, which is right across the board.  They always put something in with at least a modicum of plausibility and as long as it's about 2% plausible reasons for something, we accept that.  And as I say, it was the advisor to President Wilson, Colonel Mandell House, that gave himself the title, Colonel, because it was honorary.  He said for everything that happens in politics, he meant in government in general, and law, he said there's always a good reason, and then there's a real reason.  Therefore when they're governing the children, and we are the children, you see, they can't tell us the truth, because we'd object if we knew the whole truth, and where laws were really intended to go.  When 9/11 happened, how many of you out there thought that this was going to be almost a strip-search procedure across the Western World, in fact all the way, not just the West, but all the way to even Australia or New Zealand at the airports and stuff like that?  How many of you thought that would happen?  And you don't wear turbans, or anything else, you know.  I mean really. And yet, of course, what it tells you, is you see, it was nothing to do, nothing to do with the Middle East whatsoever or Muslims; that was used as the excuse. 


I think it was Plato that said, that if there was no God, they'd have to invent one.  He also said it was a very wise man that invented God.  Well, it's the same thing with 9/11 you see.  If the Towers didn't come down by a supposed act of terrorism, they would have had to invent it.  Therefore, personally I think they did invent it.  And regardless of what they say, the towers came down, the two towers came down like any controlled demolition.  And every country, that was the keystone to it all, every country was on board with the same totalitarian measures, the exact same totalitarian measures, immediately.  That takes prior planning.  Because bureaucracies and governmental departments are very slow when it comes to international relations and treaties and so on.  All of that had to be signed covertly, quietly, over many years for them all to go into this action with this same agenda at the same time.  And that's what really ticks us all off.  We know, some of us knew immediately what was going to happen.  I said, I think it was even that night, on a radio show I said, the hardest thing, the hardest thing you'll have from now on over what's to come, over the years, the hardest thing to do will be to hang on to your sanity as things are turned upside-down completely.  And that's happened.  And there's a lot more to go.  Because we're trained step by step in a Fabian type technique, and it always works.  And it's very simple: accept the first little part of something that's not right, and the rest of it is quite easy.  In fact they always use the last part they've introduced to justify the second part.  Oh, you already accepted that, so what's your problem?  That's what they use.  Or they'll say, well Sweden's passed this law, what's wrong with us doing it?  That's how they justify things today, you see.  In other words, the right or wrong of it doesn't even come into the debate.  Or the injustices it brings with it. 


We're going through a revolution, and we're dealing with the masters of revolution. We tend to think that revolutions are bloody, and people are revolting in the streets and so on.  That's only one type of revolution, which again, is generally managed.  In fact, successful revolutions are always preplanned, that's what the writers who did their own memoirs, of the founding fathers, wrote about they couldn't have a spontaneous revolution.  It took years of preparation.  You had to have a doctrine to follow, something to teach; it was the same with Marxism.  You couldn't say, everything is wrong, let's revolt.  That's called a riot, you see.  A riot.  When you have a revolution you must have a doctrine, you must have an ideology, you must know where you're taking the people.  And always it's only those at the top who understand where you're really going.  Where you're really going.  The people at the bottom are always sold some kind of utopian idea of fairness and equality, which is always a lie.  But that doesn't matter.  You're used to get on board.  In fact, I remember looking at a handbook for Communists at one point, years ago, printed in New York of course, and it said that it was only important that true covert Marxists get into power by lying and saying anything at all, it didn't matter, just to get in.  And once they were in, they could do what they wanted to do. 

We had this in Canada when Pierre Trudeau got into power as the Prime Minister.  Now Pierre Trudeau, a multi-millionaire, and again most folks think of Marxists as being sort of poor working class, but nothing is further from the truth.  It's an elitist organization, and he actually had led the Comintern, the young communists for Canada.  He was the head of their party in 1952.  He led them from Canada to Moscow for their annual meeting.  And it's strange when he was running for government, not one single newspaper mentioned that fact.  Why is that? Well you see, the Big Boys at the top run Communism, and they run capitalism.  They run both sides of it, and they need both sides.  Sometimes they'll need to bring in a Socialist dictator for a little while to alter your system, and that's what Pierre Trudeau did.  He completely altered the system.  There was no national debt to speak of for Canada, until he got in and he left it with a massive, massive growing debt, and changed everything upside down.   And he even admitted at one point, when he was on with I think it was René Lévesque, his pal, who admitted on television, we were kind of misguided when we were younger with ideals, etc, meaning communist, you see.  You must lie to get in, that's the key to it.  You lie to get in, by any means possible, you lie to get in, and once you're in you go on what you're told to do.  And sometimes those who rule both sides, you see, will put in what appears to be a right winger, generally for foreign wars and things, or to bring in a totalitarian regime at home, set up the machinery, which is what Bush did, then they bring in what appears to be the Communist character who brings in "I'm for the people" stuff, and he'll use the force whenever need be.  But they're the masters of revolution, because they have used revolutions down through the ages. 

And not only that, they use geopolitics, it's combined with psychopolitics, because each political area, according to the cultures of the people, you must tailor-make your revolution, and the ideals of the revolution for that particular culture.  What would work in one place wouldn't work in another.  Therefore you use geo-politics and psycho-politics.  And that's what they can also do, the same thing at home, for different eras.  It's interesting too that all academia takes grants from the same big foundations, and it's always through academia and professors that push certain ideals for a particular age or part of an age, and they rile up the students, who end up wanting to protest about what they see as obvious injustice, never realizing there's a much bigger game at the top that they'll never understand.  Lenin said the same thing.  He says to the masses we tell them it's about equality and fairness, and then for those in the middle ranks, the lesser bureaucrats, etc, they give them another ideology and doctrine.  And then the Politburo, for those who rule, the elite families who rule, you have another doctrine again.  That's how things really work.  And it's just the same in the Western World when it comes to right wing and left wing.  There's always what they see perceived at the bottom by both, people who join these groups or classes if you like.  And there's another middle-ranking group of educated, higher educated people, and then there's the real policy makers at the top, that often aren't even elected.  They're advisors, they're put in as advisors to make sure the Presidents do what they're told.  It seems complex, but it's not complex because we're dealing with techniques that have been used for hundreds of years, hundreds of years.  There's many techniques used.  When they talked about the next part of their revolution to bring in their controlled society, not just a controlled society, but an updated man, by using science, because the elite's problem was always, always the numbers of populations, when they get to a magic number, they're terrified of revolution which is outside of their control.  Therefore, they've always tried to keep populations down.  They always turn on their own people eventually.  Always.  Psychopaths do that.  And they hope to use science, you see.  They've always put science up as their god.  Knowledge is power.  But knowledge which can be enforced by big money and laws is very powerful indeed.  That's science. 

Aldous Huxley who came from a lineage, a long lineage, of the aristocracy, in fact, Sir Thomas Huxley was his grandfather, the best pal of Charles Darwin.  He took up the Darwinian cause once Darwin died.  They all came from the same cliques, you might say.  And Darwinism was the first attempt to eliminate the old rules of God.  That was one of their prime tenets, they had to destroy first God, then the family unit.  They could have no opposition, so government would be in charge of the individual.  Back with more after the following break.

Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix.  Talking about the ruling oligarchy, you might say.  That's what Huxley called them, Aldous Huxley.  He was writing his stuff, Brave New World, and so on, and Brave New World Revisited later on, while his brother Julian Huxley was the first CEO of the United Nations branch, UNESCO, who wrote books about creating a uniform society across the world, standardized with an indoctrinated youth program, basically, worldwide.  That's happened.  We're all given this same Plato's cave in which to live and think.  And all the questions we'd have are answered already, so we don't have to look for answers.  That's what Plato's Cave also is.  And Huxley said at his 1962 speech at Berkley, and remember too, he was talking to an Ivy League crew that were going off into governmental departments and so on, so he can speak more openly to them.  And behaviorists and psychologists, etc, that's who, in other words a peer type group controllers.  And he says, "It seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this: That we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude."  And that was at Berkley, 1962.  I have that audio on my archives section.  If you go into the cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, and scroll down until you see all those little square boxes and punch up the archives of previous shows.  And he also said this, "There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears.  So to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods, and this seems to be the final revolution."  That's how he saw it.  So a world where we're all slaves.  We'll be servants.  Again, remember too, that is the ideal that came out of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, the Council on Foreign Relations, to bring in a world of Service. 

They want us to be happy slaves because we'll have so much brainwashing, and we'll also be tinkered with, with pharmacological techniques and drugs and so on.  Well the drugs are all over society.  Most of them are prescribed by doctors, and that's why they wanted to get at the children very young.  So we'll be the happiest slaves really that ever existed, and to be honest with you, when you look around you, they are.  They're dumbed down.  They can't think very clearly or quickly because of all the junk food they've grown up eating and still eat.  So it was also in the food you see.  You don't have to just put out pills, you can also put it in the food.  Remember the article I read yesterday, about using the food supply and water, by Paul Ehrlich.  That's one of the methods of sterilizing the people.  But they also thought about drugging the people, you see.  It's happened.  Then all the inoculations you've had since childhood, all done on faith.  This really is a polio shot, honestly, and the doctor will think that too, and think you're crazy if you disagree.  Everyone takes it on pure faith and sticks the stuff in your arm.  And then you drop a few points in the IQ level.  They have officially dropped IQ level to a new normal by a few points.  I think it's 5 or 6 points down.  I don't know what the next one is to drop to. 

We're going through techniques.  And where do the techniques come from?  They're used through school.  Now they call it neuroscience, and neurolinguistics, and neural psychodrama, etc.  There's a whole bunch of terms they use for the media, especially the visual media, where they can use emotive embedding.  If you want to train a child to believe something emphatically, and become even a radical fighter for something, a good illustration is the whole green movement, and save the animals and so on.  They'll show you a clip, and listen to all the stuff you always get through school, and even for adults in documentaries, why do you think there's always a kind of background music there?  Why is that?  Why is it necessary to put a background dramatical type music to get a point across?  It's because it lulls you into a different phase, a different alpha phase, in your mindset.  It hypnotizes you.  It helps because the visual part already is set up to hypnotize you.  With television it's the flicker rate too, but also with the particular dramatical ominous music.  When they're showing you something they want to embed in you, they'll show you an animal fighting for its life, because of something that man's done to it.  And you'll think this is happening all over.  And they'll often suggest that it is.  Or they'll show you some clear-cut, the same clear-cut part of a forest they've shown for the last fifty years, and use the same techniques on that.  And that child will think of the injustice of it all, and why everything is suffering because of this, and they become radical.  That embeds in their minds.  Imprinting it's called.  Imprinting.  It's used.  That's just one technique.  There's many techniques. 

There's a form of psychodrama, which they also use, and someone when Obama was running or put there to run, did a fantastic exposé on the hypnotic techniques used in his speeches.  Whoever wrote his speeches did a very good job.  But they also trained him on how to use his arms and how to pause and look at the sky and look at the ground and so on, to either accept something or dismiss something.  These are all techniques used, which the public are unaware of, but they'll lap it up.  Back with more, after this break.


Hi folks, this is Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through the Matrix.  Just touching on something before I go into the stories for tonight.  I have to rush through things because there's not much time in an hour to get through things at all, and there's so much always to say that you can only say a fraction.  As I say, whenever you watch a documentary, always remember there's background music when they're trying to give you facts supposedly.  You wouldn't need the music.  And what happens with this kind of music, it's always dramatic.  It's the kind of music that instills a kind of fight or flight syndrome inside the listener.  Your adrenaline shoots up.  Your heart will actually speed up as well.  Often in fact, you can play the music itself with a certain rhythm, fast rhythm.  And your heart will start to match it.  They understand this kind of thing.  So you bring on a fight or flight crisis type situation within the listener and that opens you up wide for more programmability, you're more suggestible during that particular period.  So the visual will then impact you.  Whatever is visual will impact you.  You'll say how terrible and awful this is and those who are showing you a side of something, and they maybe have invented the very thing that you're seeing, just for the show.  Never forget that.  Then that will embed itself in you, and you'll be a true advocate for a cause later on in life.  That's standard technique, standard technique.  Absolutely standard.

Now I just want to touch on something I mentioned last week too, or maybe the beginning of this week.  It was to do with weather warfare.  And a caller had said that he'd thought it was the History Channel, they'd showed a program on some of the history of weather warfare, HAARP, and so on.  And I found a clip, it's only about 10 minutes I think from that show, and I'll put that up tonight.  It's very interesting how they even tested out in the 50s, I think it was '52 in Britain, and caused incredible flooding, and people were actually, bodies were floated out to sea, they were lost at sea, from the shore.  This incredible flood took place, and the Royal Airforce admitted that they were doing weather warfare experiments over that area at that time.  But it also goes into stuff from later on as well.  Understand too, that the program is called, That's Impossible.  They have a whole series of them on different topics, but I believe they're replaying the show Saturday, July the 25th at 4pm.  I don't know if that's Central, Eastern, or what, but that's to be shown again.  It's called, That's Impossible: Weather Warfare.  July 25th, 4pm, and I think it's probably the same channel, History Channel.  So you should get your recording devices ready and try to get a copy of it.  It will be a very important one probably. 

It's interesting though, these shows, they tend to leave it hanging in the air, even when they have evidence.  I've also in the past given out an article to do with the yellow stuff that was coming down in one place.  It came down here too in Canada, where I live, a couple of years ago, in early spring, long before pollen was out.  And this guy had the same thing happen in the States, and they did test it, and it was Cadmium that was coming down.  And I might even try to find that link again.  It's a regular television exposé on this particular thing.  But you know, I've got so many articles here, and I've also got so much stuff that's declassified from the U.S., Canadian, and British governments, and other governments that really, I'd have to go into about a month, a month to show you what they've done to their own people.  What they've tested on their own people.  This gelatinous stuff they're dropping all over Britain that's been in the papers very recently.  They're finding this kind of clear type jelly everywhere, that's identical to the stuff they've used for carrying, it's a medium which they carry bacteria and viruses down to the ground with.  And I have, there's a show, mainstream again, on the United States, where the U.S. military used this over a town, six times I think, in a few weeks, and the people, pretty well all of them came down with different illnesses, infections and so on.  It killed all their domestic animals.  And luckily they took a sample to a hospital, and you'll hear the guy in this particular clip who examined the specimen, this gelatinous stuff again, and he found it was even contaminated white blood cells in there.  Well, that's what you use if you want to, you see they use animals and even corpses for growing bacterium and viruses, and then they simply mince them up, pretty well, take the blood out, it's all infected, and that's how you in a crude fashion just spread this stuff.  You spray it.  Mainstream television.  So they use this gelatinous stuff for doing it.  I have other articles too from declassified U.S. military articles where they admit they do use this jelly stuff for exactly that, bacterial and viral warfare purposes.  You don't have to worry about other countries doing anything.  You see, our own governments have been doing amazing things on us all along.  And we know that even from the sterility rates too.  That was all planned.  It's all planned.

Whenever you find something happening in real life, you have to go in like any detective, and just say, well who mentioned they'd like this to be done, and you'll get such a host of people, like the Huxleys, and like the Russells, like the Ehrlichs, Paul Ehrlich, you'll find that with even Mr. Holdren who wrote his EcoScience book, he's now the Science Czar, as they call him for the United States, who wanted to drastically depopulate the world, and they're all out in the open now, Optimum Population Trust.  When something happens in society that people wanted to happen, you can take it for granted it was caused to happen, by intelligent sources, not by happenstance.  That's how you take evidence into court of law.  You take it into the court of law, and supposedly the decision is arrived at by the preponderance of evidence.  And we have so much of it, that you have to accept it.  You see, we've been under attack all our lives.  Remember, Lord Bertrand Russell, a good friend of the Huxleys and all the other characters involved in setting up this present system, said he would even use the needle, the needle, injections, for compliance amongst the public and so on, and bringing the population down.  Who benefits?  Always ask, who benefits.  Who worked towards this?  Who had meetings about this?  Many, many meetings, and then you'll come to the same conclusion.  Intelligent minds, with power to back them, and governments to help them put things in law, made this all happen.  Very, very simple.  It's no coincidence.


And talking about how they'd use psychological techniques and pharmacology and all the rest of it, it's much easier when you have destroyed society completely.  Remember, they said they'd have to destroy the cultures of the Western World completely.  First religion, then the family unit.  The Ehrlichs and all these characters wrote about the necessity for destroying the family unit, because people were torn between standing up for their relatives against governments, or obeying governments, that was why they'd have to destroy it, and they've done that pretty well.  And the Ehrlichs and the Holdrens and so on, were just lower agents, you might say, players for the big powers that controlled them, they took their orders from.  And they still take their orders from.  And now it's much, much easier to get adults to accept their children themselves.  Have you noticed that most folk have no confidence in their own judgments any more?  Because we're all treated like children.  Huxley said too, and Russell said, they were bringing in a society of experts, so the public would literally throw their own judgments to the side as being inferior to the experts' opinions.  That's happened.  And here's what they can do, once they've done this, you see.  This is from the Telegraph; this is an ongoing agenda in this actual area.  All of these agendas are ongoing.

All parents to sign 'behaviour contracts'

(Alan: With governmental agencies.)

All parents will be forced to sign

(A: Forced to sign.  I love how they even word it now.  That at one time would have caused riots itself.)

All parents will be forced to sign "contracts" to ensure their children behave at school, the Government has announced.

(A: Sieg Heil.)

By Graeme Paton, Education Editor

22 Jul 2009

Pupils and their families will be required to agree to the deal - setting out minimum standards of behaviour and attendance - before the start of term. Contracts, known as Home School Agreements, will also establish parents' responsibilities for the first time.

(A: Now they're starting off with fines for parents.  It's all amazing how they fine you.)

They face court action and possible fines of up to £1,000 for repeatedly breaking rules.

(A: So, if your child breaks a rule, you get fined for it.  And it says it near the end of the article, they're going to keep raising the fine.  Get it on the books and then jack it up.  You see?)

The contracts will become compulsory in all English state schools under plans laid out in a Government White Paper.

Ministers suggested that "good" parents would be able to complain about other mothers and fathers who fail to ensure their children behave.

(A: So, you're going to rat on other people.  And I've mentioned this character before, his name is so appropriate.  The guy, the politician who's in charge as the Schools Secretary for Britain.  Ed Balls, you know.  Ed Balls.  This guy, this guy has really missed his vocation.  He'd have done so well under Hitler or Stalin.  He really would've.  He said:)

the changes would help stop a single student disrupting the education of his or her classmates.

(A: Well, I don't know how.  Because their parents are going to get fined?)

"If the large majority of parents are doing the right thing but a small minority do not engage you can have one lesson for 30 kids disrupted by one child," he said.

"Every parent will have to, as part of the admissions process, say they take on board the obligations in the Home School Agreement, and every parent will be expected to reaffirm that every year.

(A: Do you understand, parents are now becoming children.  And the Big Daddy is Government.  You know, it's like everything else, and it's so true.  Lenin said it all.  He was taught by the best bankers on the planet.  He said that they would, in the West, we'll bring up services and each service will be raised gradually and gradually.  In other words, Fabian style, up to the status of authority.  So you have education services that are now authorities.  You have health services that are now authorities.  They're all branches you see.  Independent to an extent, but given the power of government from government, and backed by government.  Authorities.  And the parents are now children, being taught that they are children by these kind of laws.)

"If other parents feel that the HSA is not being enforced against other parents they will be able to tell the local education authority."

(A: And then it goes on to say right down to the bottom, where it says:)

fines of up to £1,000.

(A: But they're going to review that, and it will probably go up again.  This Balls character even says that…)

"Heads will be able to say to the recalcitrant parents,

(A: So, see you're a bad, hang your heads in shame like a bad student, parents out there.  Recalcitrant parents.)

if you do not sign this or make sure they do the homework, or support discipline, then we will take that as evidence in the magistrates' court."


It's incredible, incredible what they're doing.  That's totalitarianism.  We are under police states.  Very evidently so.  There's no democracy in anything.  That was a good cover for a long time.  The true fascists at the top are out in the open.  Out in the open now.  Here's another article, of where all police states go, apart from monitoring everything, every subject and citizen, and all your moves and all your data, that's standard police state technique, and also censoring what you're told by mainstream.  Not that mainstream objects, because they're part of the control mechanism.  Here's another article, exactly along the same line.  This is from The Mail Online:

Cash rewards for neighbors who rat on the crooks next door

25 May 2007

Neighbors could receive huge cash rewards for trapping VAT (A: That's a sort of tax they pay on goods in Britain) or customs cheats living next door.

(A: You see, they always hit you as though it's a good thing.  It's the low scum at the bottom they're after, but that's not true.  It's everybody they're after.  They call it the alternate or underground economy.  Those who still sell stuff at flea markets and things like that.  That's really what it's for.)

In return for evidence which could be used to seize the assets of a local fraudster, the informant would be granted a share of the ill-gotten gains.

The payout could be as high as 30 per cent of the total amount seized potentially running into hundreds of thousands of pounds.


Ministers (A: That's politicians.) have also not ruled out allowing informants to take over a neighbour's possessions, such as luxury cars or plasma TVs, if they had been bought with the proceeds of crime.

It is the latest Home Office idea to target the luxury lifestyles enjoyed by criminals, after the disappointing start made by the Assets Recovery Agency

(A: They're not going after the politicians, all of them who are overcharging on all their expenses accounts by thousands and thousands of pounds.  It's nothing to do with what they say.  It's going after everybody who's got a little push cart selling sausages on the street.  That's really what it's after.) 

Other new powers could include the right to seize fashionable or ostentatious lifestyle items from thieves and burglars, such as jewelery, china and laptops.

It could include, for example, secretly taken photographs.

(A: Everybody's going to become a spy on everybody else, because of lust, you see.  I want what they've got.)

Offenders who could be companies or individuals may include VAT cheats, and those who bring in cigarettes and alcohol from abroad for re-sale without paying any duty.

(A: You know, it's in the papers too, you can buy a snort of cocaine for a pound, one pound in Britain, now.  And here they are going after guys who bring in a few bottles of booze.  It says here, the only thing that could be wrong with this is:)

...it could easily lead to disputes between neighbours, with households spying on each other in the hope they will eventually get their hands on their wealth.


Well, of course it will, but they want to really degrade society until you get all this happening at the bottom.  And you know, the police already do that in most countries now.  It's like you see, we took it from the Soviet Union.  The Soviet Union, when they went into someone's house, they confiscated all the goods in that house, regardless of what the charge was, and they split the loot amongst themselves.  That was standard operating procedure.  And then the Western Countries started to do the same, first with drugs and then with other things.  You see.  Now they're just expanding it until everyone is going to spy on everybody else because they want what they've got.  Amazing, isn't it, how they encourage criminality from the top, because a lot of people will set up their neighbors, all you have to do is put down some weed somewhere, round their house, get the place attacked, and then you come away with a plasma television.  That will happen.  Encouraging crime.  But you see government can't do anything but go by its nature, because they are the criminals.  They are the criminals.

And here's another article here, about this incredible fascist system, where private business is totally integrated with government, to do with the drug companies, and the profits they're hoping to make from all this scary stuff on the non-existent flu.  Back with more after this break.

Hi folks, this is Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through the Matrix.  The big pharma companies are really just raking the cash in with all this hype and fear that they've helped generate.  And this is from The Mail Online:

Glaxo profits soar as drug firm charges NHS £6 for swine flu vaccine that costs £1 to make

(A: What a deal, there's a profit, eh.  And then it goes on.)

23rd July 2009

Drugs giant GlaxoSmithKline was accused of cashing in on swine flu after it revealed its profits have risen 10 per cent since the virus was identified.

It announced profits yesterday of £2.1billion in the past three months. Sales of vaccines and antiviral drugs could push the figure up even higher.


Boy, they're going to pump this for everything they've got, eh.  But there you go.  It costs one pound to make a shot, and they sell it to the Health Service for 6 pounds.  So there you go, there's where the money is these days, eh.  It's in crisis creation and you've got the solution.  Not that it will be the solution mind you.  I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole, anything they offered me.  Now there's a caller there, we'll try and get him in.  Kevin from Texas.  Are you there Kevin?


Kevin: Yes, I'm here sir. 


Alan: Go ahead.


Kevin: Yeah, I guess we're short on time, so I'll make it quick.  I recently reread Atlas Shrugged, and I was a little surprised on some of the subtle things I missed thirty years ago, the first time I read it.  And my question was, what did you think of Ms. Rand, and her writings, and where she, if she had a particular position amongst the Russells, the Huxleys, and so forth.


Alan: Well, she did.  I think her name was Alice Rosenbaum.  She changed it when she came over.  And she had many followers from the Middle Class, who thought she spoke for them.  And being an individual, and doing an individual thing, but you have to look at what she was saying from another side of the fence.  Look who she mixed with.  She was a mistress of Baron Rothschild at one point, for a long time.  She was speaking on behalf of those she called geniuses who already ruled the world, who were individualists and had the right to do with the world as they saw fit.  And that the masses hindered them.  She even put the ideas in her books like Atlas Shrugged and so on, and there was another one too, I can't remember the name of it, but this guy fights his way out of a Totalitarian sort of religious society, and becomes an individual, then a Lord, and then he ends up with Ego, I am pure Ego, I am Master.  So in other words, it depends on what side of the fence.  She was actually speaking on behalf of the elite themselves, not the followers who followed her.  And therefore the Rothschilds, men of genius, who already ruled the world, had the right to do as they wished with the whole planet, and everybody in it.  And that's a telling point.  It was very, very interesting to see that the followers thought she was speaking for the average middle class American.


Kevin: Yeah.  Thirty years ago, when I first read it, I thought she was speaking for the Libertarian type American, and when I just re-read it, you're right.  That's exactly what I got.  I was kind of surprised, I realized, Oh, No, no, no, no, no.  She wasn't speaking for us.


Alan: That's right, and she mixed with Einstein and all these characters in Hollywood.  She was always with the multi-millionaires, individuals who were really outside of politics directing whole countries.  And she admired these people.  And that's what she was all about, that the masses had no right to keep these people behind or pull them down, or not let them do what they wanted to do, and now we're facing it, because the ones who are ruling the world are the very people she was talking about.


Kevin: I know we're running out of time.  I can hear the music.  If you can give me one writer, one writer that speaks for the real people, who would it be?


Alan:  For the real people?  I'd have to get back to you on that; it would take a bit of thinking.


Kevin: Give me one name.


Alan: That's the music, so it's the end of the show for tonight, so from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it's Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.



Topics of show covered in following links:

Video: "CONFIRMED!! Chemtrails and Weather Warfare" (at disclose.tv).

Video: "Poison Rains Infect Small Town" [U.S. Biowarfare on Oakville, Washington] (youtube.com) - May 8, 1997.

"All parents to sign 'behaviour contracts' " by Graeme Paton (telegraph.co.uk) - July 22, 2009.

"Cash rewards for neighbours who rat on the crooks next door" by James Slack (dailymail.co.uk) - May 25, 2007.

"Glaxo profits soar as drug firm charges NHS £6 for swine flu vaccine that costs £1 to make" (dailymail.co.uk) - July 23, 2009.



Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"