Aug. 4, 2009 (#378)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Aug. 4, 2009:

Gene Calamity -- it's All in the Family:

"Sir Crispin Tickell, Not Terribly Funny,
Descended from Huxleys via Great-Grandmummy,
A Notable Family, Striving for Perfection,
Championing the Cause for Special Selection,
To Manage the Commoners, Me and You,
They did Lots of Study at the Simian Zoo,
Part of Their Theory from Darwin's Pocket
Is that Lesser Types Perish, Like Staging Rocket,
While the Fittest Go on, All Quite Natural,
Justifying Their Religion 'cause Nothing's Quite Factual,
We've to be Neutered and Culled o'er Period of Time
In Plans of the Powerful, Descended from Slime"
© Alan Watt Aug. 4, 2009


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Aug. 4, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
alternate sites:  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


HI folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on August 4th 2009.  Newcomers look into web site.  Scroll down the page and you can see all the other sites I have up.  You should bookmark them for future use in case the main servers go down once again.  [listed above] which is the European site and has all the same audios as all the other sites have for free download but it also has some transcripts written in the various languages of Europe OF the same audios.  So for those that prefer reading, you can print them up and read them at your leisure.  While I’m on the subject of translations, if there’s anyone who want to try their hand at translation get in touch with me at [email listed above] and we’ll give it a shot. 


This is the only show out there that depends upon the listeners to keep me going.  I don’t ask for money from advertisers.  The ads on this show that you hear are paid straight to RBN.  That’s who handles it all.  I have nothing to do with it.  That pays for the air time, the staff and equipment and so on.  So it’s up to you to keep me going.  You can do so by looking into the web sites.  [Options listed above.]  Some innovative people just send cash.  That saves a lot of trouble and it certainly cuts down on everybody’s cost on both ends.  


A lot of disks get burned and passed around by people who have computers for others who don’t have computers and who don’t like computers and I don’t blame them at all.   There’s no privacy in the world of computers.  That’s what it’s out there for, to get us trained into having no privacy.  We see the restrictions getting put on us every year and they’re open about it.  It’s to monitor every individual.  It’s used as a tool.  Eventually it will be used to punish you if you don’t go along with social alterations and changes in society.  You’ll get punished by being restricted or kept out of the internet all together.  That’s already been discussed in high places.  Everything that you become addicted to is eventually used OVER you as a tool to make you ‘toe the line,’ as the Masons say.  Therefore, those who get them passed around, you can always get in touch with me by writing to me at [address listed above]. 


You know most people are caught up in the daily media.  That’s what the media is for.  It’s to keep you entangled every day of your life in what you think are really new threats or new controversies, things to get you arguing about or upset about or at the very least preparing you.  Preparing you for what’s to come.  There’s many ways to prepare people.  Those at the top can either tell you directly, we’re going to do this… and give you a date and so on, or they break it to you gently in the form of debates, debates between experts.  Really, you simply take the expert that suits you best and you take his opinion.  That’s how it’s done.  That’s what media is for… to get us ready for the changes that are already preplanned.  Back with more after this break. 


Hi folks.  I’m Alan Watt.  We’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  What you find when you study history and biographies of people who’ve been high-level bureaucrats or they worked in civil service or the military their whole lives at high positions is that they’re always planning a future. 


We think at the bottom – and we’re meant to think at the bottom – that we just stumble day to day and problems crop up and are dealt with on the spot by experts who debate for a couple of days, then make a decision and then make it all right again.  That’s how we’re taught.  We’re really infantile at the bottom.  We’re kept like children… truly.  I say ‘mushrooms’ often because that’s how you grow mushrooms in commercial growing.  You’re kept in the dark and you’re fed different kinds of bovine fecal matter.  That’s how we are at the bottom.   We have a complete reality made for us and because our parents swallowed that reality, then the child is born and takes over their parents’ opinions.  There’s no one to warn them that this is fake, this is a con, that, really, we’re just slaves at the bottom. 


Slaves at one time were very important.  We came out of serfdom, which was slavery.  In the Western world they don’t like to call them slaves.  They like to call them serfs.  It sounds better.  You were bought and sold with the land.  There were different rebellions from the peasants that occasionally would come along and frighten the upper crust.  They were always terrified of there being too many of them and they could overcome their armies or their Knights and all the rest of it.  So they gave us a thing called democracy in really a brief period of a time when we keep more of our earnings for things we didn’t really need.  Before, the serfs used to give about 60% of all their harvest to their Lords.  Those were the days without intensive farming.  It was heavy manual work, heavy, labor intensive.  Therefore, the farmer, the serf was left with enough to feed himself, the livestock and maybe a couple of helpers and that was about it.  The Lord would take his cut; pass it up to his overlord, Baron or whatever.  It went all the way up to the King basically.  That’s how the system worked, much like the Soviet Union was run. 


Then they gave us democracy.  Thinking if we’d get to vote every 4 or 5 years, then our agitation will be somewhat subdued if we think that we have a chance of voting the last corrupt out and getting in the next bunch.  We live in hope.  It’s a hopeful sort of idea.  Yet we’re always disappointed and most folk never in their whole lives catch on that there’s only one game going on and there’s only one party.  Even though big players and authorized historians for the Council on Foreign Relations come out with books and tell us that there is only ONE party.  The ones at the top always belong to the Council on Foreign Relations and have been – in the 1960s, for 60 years, according to Professor Carroll Quigley who was given access to their records. 


In Britain it’s called the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  Now they have a European Institute for International Affairs.  It’s the same bunch.  Every British Commonwealth country has a department of International Affairs.  It’s not a governmental department.  That’s the beauty of it.  It even says on most of its books, in fact, when it tells you and thanks Rockefeller for publishing this book because that’s who funds them.  It will tell you it’s a non-political organization.  Then when you read through their books you see nothing about what YOU would think at the bottom, is politics.  But they’re not discussing politics; they’re simply laying down policy.  Big difference.  There’s a big difference when you’re not playing politics.  You’re simply there to make an agenda and to put down and iron out the problems for this agenda, to make way for it, to make it easier to put into effect in society. 


They have all kinds of meetings across the world and they also have Round Tables.  After the big meetings, they take select people, put them down at Round Tables and they give them each a particular problem to solve.  How do we get this particular program IN to the minds of the public?  They’ll talk about setting up front groups, other front groups and NGOs for instance and funding them, green parties and all that kind of stuff, to bring down the population because that’s the real agenda.  It’s nothing to do with saving the world.  It’s a front.  Even when there’s a Cold War going on, what you notice is, they’ve already planned a POST Cold War period.  You often wonder when you’re reading the biographies of the big players, how on earth did they know?  How could they be absolutely sure that the Cold War wasn’t going to go on for another 20, 30 years?  Technically, there’s no reason why it couldn’t.  They’d already had the future planned POST Cold War.  One of their big, big problems was guess what?  A post-industrial society. 


In their 1930s books – I think it was 1938 at one global meeting – the Royal Institute for International Affairs had even talked about China and how strong China would become commercially and that it could even become the industrial leader for the future.  When they wrote that, China technically was a third world country; a few very rich people and mass of peasants.  They even had in that particular meeting – it was held in Australia that year – the upcoming war with Germany.  It was a done deal.  It hadn’t started yet but it was a done deal.  They even said who they’d support.  They’d have to save Russia at all costs.  Why would you save what seemed to be your main enemy that wanted to wipe out – you’d think – the Royal family and all that kind of stuff and all the aristocrats?  Why would you want to save them?


It was traditional for Britain in bygone centuries, to arm one of your enemies and then let them go at it with some other enemy.  That way they’d weaken each other.  Why wouldn’t you allow Germany to simply to go at it with Russia and get rid of your two main enemies?  But they didn’t.  They said they’d have to save Russia at ALL costs.  It isn’t until you go further back that you realize that West and the banking system and the Establishment funded and set up the Soviet Experiment, as it was called. 


Trotsky even complained in his writings about Lenin and then Stalin bringing over all the British aristocrats - Lords and Ladies and so on - and giving them grand tours of Moscow, etc.  Well listed.  HG Wells and all these boys went across there and they loved it.  They were all members of the Fabian Society, another branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  They had specialized branches. 


Their big problem early on was how to control a big population in a post-industrial era.  Post World War II even.  Remember, during World War II Britain signed an agreement under the United Nations to DEindustrialize.  I wasn’t just disarmament, it was DEindustrialization.  Many of the other countries followed suit because they already decided they were going to set up China as THE model state for the whole world… that we have to emulate.  I spoke about this a few years back there and people kind of said ‘Oh, come on; we could never emulate China’ and we’re doing it in so many different ways. 


How it is done?   Well, the same way.  The media is there to prepare your minds.  It’s like planting a field.  You can’t plant a field by scattering seeds.  You’ve got to get in there and you’ve got to plow it up and then get rid of all the weeds and the stones and then furrow it and harrow it and all the rest of it.  Then, if the soil is ready for it at the right season, you start planting.  That’s what they do with your mind.  They give you years of subtle indoctrination.  They call it ‘consciousness raising.’  Whenever you hear that term, run away.  It means they’re trying to brainwash you without you knowing it.  In other words, they’re bringing a topic, not just a topic but with a solution to the topic into your head without you really voluntarily working your way through any of it, just accepting the conclusions.  Raising conscious awareness, public awareness… that’s what it means. 


You’ll find the same big players intergenerationally going down through time, as psychopathic and as adamant as their forefathers were.  I’ve talked about the Optimum Population Trust, this massively wealthy organization that admits it’s a rich, white man’s club basically… they’re not ashamed of that at all.  They BELIEVE that it’s nature’s way and those who have survival of the fittest qualities should be AT THE TOP deciding what they want to do with the rest of the world.  And they DO what they want with the rest of the world. 


Sir Crispin Tickell, amazing guy.  Contrary to the last part of his name, Tickell, he’s not a very funny character at all.  He is rather crisp though.  This character, if you look in to Wikipedia, was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.  He’s the great-grandson of Jessica Huxley… of the Huxley family.  The Huxley’s are through all of them.  The Darwin’s, the Huxley’s, all these characters are ALL part of the same family origins.  It’s as though they were clones of their forefathers because they have the same agenda:  depopulation, survival of the fittest and they should be at the top.  They’re well funded obviously and they just sail up through the British aristocracy up to top positions in the country and politics.  They’re generally elected to things, given lots of titles and letters behind their names which they don’t even earn generally.  They’re always grand commanders and all that kind of stuff. 


This guy Tickell was appointed to the United Nations on the permanent Security Council.  He’s been ambassador to so many different things, President of the European Commission, for instance, ‘78-80.    Ambassador to Mexico and all the rest of it.  I’m going to talk more about Mr. Tickell, a not so funny guy, after this break.


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt.  We’re Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing the big policy makers at the top.  How they get ideas across to us, the public at the bottom.  How they prepare our minds for things, often years and years in advance.  The other night in fact, I mentioned a movie made in 1971 called Zero Population Growth.  They started a long time ago influencing us, mainly through fiction to begin with, to the public through books and then movies, such as that last movie.  Also, Soylent Green was one of them.  Soylent Green was written under the title Make Room, Make Room


The whole idea was to get everybody terrified about a future of overpopulation.  The reality from books I have on population management going back to the early 1900s had people writing rebuffs in their books to Britain - who in 1920 from the top aristocracy, 2 years after World War I had killed millions of people - the rebuffs were about the fact that Britain and the aristocracy and even the Churchills too were very vocal on this, wanted the ordinary people to start curbing the size of their family.  The rebuffs had the numbers of children that these big aristocratic families had, which were much, much bigger than the people at the bottom.  They had the statistics too which showed you that Britain had been declining – and the later books proved this too – in family size for years and years, right up to the present.  If it wasn’t for mass immigration and the APPEARANCE of overcrowding - which is true, the more they bring in to the cities that are overcrowded; they were only meant to have so many people in the first place – but it give the appearance of overcrowding and then they turn around and blame the people who had done all the right things and often had only one child per family or two maximum.  That keeps a stable population at 2 per family and many of them opted for no children at all.  So you can’t please you masters.  That was never the intention. 


The intention is a WORLD society, remember.  A world society.  They have no favorites.  Those who rule England have no favorites in countries.  They’re international.  Their goal, according to their old books that they wrote themselves, people who worked for this global society, their goal was to treat every country the same eventually.  So you’d all have to give the appearance of being overcrowded.  That’s why from the 60s onwards, the Western countries put a cap on urban development.  They called it urban SPRAWL; again, using terminology, psycholinguistics; sounds nasty, sprawling… you’re sprawling all over the floor, you’re untidy… sprawl.  Whenever people talked about the size of urban areas, they always called it – they’d start parroting it – urban sprawl, urban sprawl.  That’s how psycholinguistics works.  Therefore they made laws that you couldn’t expand urban areas.  You could only build on existing properties or wherever existing properties were being torn down you could build again, higher and higher.  They wanted to CONTAIN people, not just to stop them from growing out into the countryside but really they wanted to bring in a controlled society, a survielled society, a society where they have cameras, etc everywhere like we have today.  All planned a long time ago, before we were born it was planned.  That’s the amazing thing. 


I’ve gone through the histories – look into the audio archives section of my web site, you’ll see the audio archives – of the eugenics movement and how they simply were open in the beginning about the right of the fittest to survive.  They used to even have magazines about the ‘most fit’ American family of the month.  They’d have photographs of them all, well-to-do, very healthy, etc.   They were also very vocal on the need to eliminate the unfit.  Hitler never dreamed up that idea by himself.  I’ve gone through the writings of the various British authors who first came out with this whole thing.  In The Soviet Story, go into that and you’ll hear the socialist program.  Socialism, the Fabian Society, really came out with all of this stuff - long before Adolf Hitler - and all of THAT came from Darwin and Darwin’s theories on the ascent of man, etc. 


These are THEORIES taken as law today.  All science programs teach evolution as FACT, absolute fact and you can’t contradict it or even question it or you’re OUT, plain and simple.  What they do at the top is to put out certain people from their own ranks in every country who are all connected.  Maurice Strong for Canada, Al Gore in the States, Crispin Tickell in Britain.  They all put these characters out to start off and start funding or at least channeling the funding from the foundations – which is the parallel government, the REAL government – into the creation of nongovernmental organizations.  They indoctrinate the public over years.  They go into schools as charitable institutions to EDUCATE children and what they’re doing is brainwashing them along a particular way of thinking and a particular viewpoint.  We’ve all heard the tape of Al Gore.  He’s up on YouTube – I gave the link once too, in the archives – where you hear him talking to children about 12 and under and he said, ‘You children know things your parents don’t know.’  He was going on about the environment and pollution and global warming.   Bypass the parents, that’s how they do it in school.  Back with more after these messages.


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt Cutting Through The Matrix, just showing you how they put out all these characters in every generation that work on the same projects.  Often, they’re from the same families.  They’re like clones of their daddies you might say, much like the Rothschild’s; they keep in banking.  These characters literally are into eugenics.  Back in the 70s, they hit upon the idea of giving an EXCUSE to bring down the population, they called it ‘sustainable development,’ under the guise that if you could just convince the public we were destroying the planet and we were all going to die, then government could step in and start mandating population control.  That’s what it was about.  Remember too, they have a Department of Population Control at the United Nations.  That was all PART of that movement too.  Where the United Nations is honest about it, they’ll say, ‘we don’t abort children across the world.’  That’s true.  They just HELP the NGOs that are all umbrella’d underneath them to abort children across the world.  They’re funded through various government agencies in the Western world and they’re funded massively by the big, tax-free foundations… that ARE the parallel government. 


Here’s this guy Tickell, getting back to Tickell again, the not so funny guy.  It says,


Crispin Tickell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


His worldwide status as an authority on climate change is all the more surprising because he has no formal academic training in this area and has formed his opinion by self-teaching.  (Alan:  No.  He was always a eugenicist as were his daddies before him.  They were part of this idea to bring the environment, a war of the environment and man, a war enterprise as The First Global Revolution book says, by the Club of Rome.  They dreamed up that scam that man was at war with the planet; therefore, to save the planet and the rest of man, man would have to start getting reduced in population basically and stop using energy.)


Tickell helped to write Margaret Thatcher's speech on global climate change. (A: These guys are into everything at the top.  They’re always appointed, never elected.)  He chaired John Major's Government Panel on Sustainable Development (1994-2000), and was a member of two government task forces under the Labour Party: one on Urban Regeneration (A:  Which is actually restriction… which is double-speak, of course.), chaired by Sir Richard Rogers, now Lord Rogers (1998-99), and one on Potentially Hazardous Near-Earth Objects (2000).


A man of strong environmental convictions, he has been described as influential in Britain, although his environmental message has not always travelled as easily abroad, particularly to the United States. His 1977 book 'Climatic Change and World Affairs' argued that mandatory international pollution control would eventually be necessary. (A: That’s after the club of Rome came up with the idea of coupling eugenics with pollution and so on.) Despite his non-scientific background, he is internationally respected as having a strong grasp of science policy issues. He has been the recipient, between 1990 and 2006, of 23 honorary doctorates.  (A:  That’s how they get them up there.  We stand in awe at all the letters behind someone’s name but that’s how they do it.  They just give them all these honorary doctorates.  I don’t even know if they have to attend to get it.  Probably sent it by mail or something.)


He is also a patron of the Optimum Population Trust (A:  We know all about them and what their goal is too.  Again, a nongovernmental organization that just happens to give advice to governments.), and told Radio 4's Today programme that the ideal population for Britain could be around 20 million. (A:  That means and awful lot has to go, an awful, awful lot has to go don’t they?  This is what you’re dealing with. These characters have never stopped their agenda from Charles Darwin going onwards


From Australia, here’s an article from the AAP.


Green group calls for one child policy

Print April 21, 2009


(A:  Now, it’s interchangeable with the speeches given by Tickell and others because it’s all the same script.)


AUSTRALIA should consider having a one-child policy to protect the planet, an environmental lobby group says.


Sustainable Population Australia (A:  That’s just another branch of the same group.) says slashing the world's population is the only way to avoid "environmental suicide''.


National president Sandra Kanck wants Australia's population of almost 22 million reduced to seven million to tackle climate change.


Restricting each couple to one baby, as China does (A:  What did I say earlier?  China… it’s been said on the CBC and at the UN and elsewhere, China is the MODEL state for the world.  That means we’re all to copy China.  China is not a democracy either.  At least they’re honest about it.  I wish these guys that pretend we’re still a democracy here would be honest about it too.  But pigs might fly when the swine flu comes.), is "one way of assisting to reduce the population''.


"It's something we need to throw into the mix,'' the former Democrats parliamentarian said.


More people means more coal-fired electricity, cars, houses, water use and food production, all of which increase greenhouse gas emissions, she said. (A:  Which is utter nonsense but it’s the same script isn’t it?  They cannot say anything different from each other.  It’s exactly the same as each other.)


Ms Kanck, who has one child herself, expects her campaign will receive a hostile reaction.


"The Catholic church is going to be in like Flynn on an argument like this.''


Sustainable Population Australia, which has about 1300 members, is so worried about climate change it is preparing a formal submission to the UN. 


What the blazes is the United Nations?  There are no people in any country in the world that voted it into existence.  It is NOT a democratic institution.  It’s not even a country.  It’s a corporation.  The leaders of every country - who are traitors all - signed every country over to it in 1946.  This is where everything is to go… it’s a FRONT organization FOR the real government, which is comprised of the parallel government with the various foundations.  Foundations that are owned by the international bankers, we all know that, who also own the big international pharma companies and who own the military-industrial complex.  They own the United Nations.  It’s run through a eugenics scheme as well.  It’s utterly frantic about population numbers, always has been.  They’ve been caught doing dirty deeds across the planet before to reduce the population.  I’ve read so many articles here I can’t remember them all. 


Anyone who wants to be successful in this day and age has to belong to one of these groups and just get the script and read it.  You’ll get lots of air time because the mainstream media will give you plenty of air time for free.  Just parrot whatever’s put down in print, whatever you want.  They never give anyone space to counter the BS that they put across to us, never. 


Here’s an article where at least some scientists went against their boss when he tried to use the organization along the road of depopulation, cutting back energy, and global warming.  This is from Mark Morano.


World’s Largest Science Group Rejecting Man-Made Climate Fears!

By Marc Morano  /  July 31, 2009  /


An outpouring of skeptical scientists who are members of the American Chemical Society (ACS) are revolting against the group's editor-in-chief -- with some demanding he be removed -- after an editorial appeared claiming “the science of anthropogenic climate change is becoming increasingly well established.” (A: Meaning man-made.)


The editorial claimed the "consensus" view was growing "increasingly difficult to challenge, despite the efforts of diehard climate-change deniers.” (A:  They’ve all been told, at one of the big world meetings to use this term, ‘climate-change deniers’ that would be associated with the Holocaust to make you feel guilty.  I have the article here where they came up with it and actually told their members to say this.  So this guy, this editor is obviously a member.)  The editor now admits he is "startled" by the negative reaction from the group's scientific members. The American Chemical Society bills itself as the "world's largest scientific society."  (A:  It tells what he printed here and it also has some answers by other people, other scientists in the group and what they say about Mr. Baum.)


In addition, the scientists called Baum's editorial: “disgusting”; “a disgrace”; “filled with misinformation”; “unworthy of a scientific periodical” and “pap.”  (A:  That’s what they say.)


One outraged ACS member wrote to Baum: "When all is said and done, and you and your kind are proven wrong (again), you will have moved on to be an unthinking urn for another rat pleading catastrophe. You will be removed. I promise."  (A:  It’s true.  They go from one crisis to another, these guys.  They know where their bread is buttered.)


Baum wrote on July 27, that he was "startled" and "surprised" by the "contempt" and "vehemence" of the ACS scientists to his view of the global warming "consensus."  (A:  It isn’t a consensus is it?  Then it’s got more and more selected excerpts of the skeptical scientists.)


“I think it's time to find a new editor,” ACS member Thomas E. D'Ambra wrote.


Geochemist R. Everett Langford wrote: “I am appalled at the condescending attitude of Rudy Baum, Al Gore, President Barack Obama, et al., who essentially tell us that there is no need for further research? that the matter is solved.”  (A:  That’s really what they’ve said isn’t it?  They’ve said, that’s it, the matter is resolved, you can’t go any further with questioning, that’s it, IT’S THE LAW.  What kind of science is that?  Science is supposed to get to the root of all things and constantly go on and on and on.  But they’ve said that’s it, that’s good enough for us.  One other scientist said… )


ACS scientist Dennis Malpass wrote: “Your editorial was a disgrace. It was filled with misinformation, half-truths, and ad hominem attacks on those who dare disagree with you. Shameful!”


ACS member scientist Dr. Howard Hayden, a Physics Professor Emeritus from the University of Connecticut: “Do you refer to 'climate change' instead of 'global warming' because the claim of anthropogenic global warming has become increasingly contrary to fact?"


(A:  Another one asks him what set of statistics he’d taken all his advice from basically.  Out of the 10 different studies that have been done… with 10 different computers.  Each time they do a different computer testing, a different bunch of information, you know.  It’s all nonsense.)


Behind it all is the ONE cause.  The one cause being a very old cause and that’s depopulation of the lessers, you know, the wrong sort of people on the planet, to bring in a utopia where the better kind will live in peace and harmony together… these sons and daughters of Knights and aristocracy that slaughtered their way to fame over centuries… will all be living in harmony with each other supposedly.  But they want to get rid of everyone else in the meantime.  After all, we are eating up all the food that their children could be eating in the future.  Why should the lesser type, the nonproducing, the nonqualified type be eating up all their food?  Never mind the fact that it’s the lesser type that MAKE all the food for the greater type.  Quite something.  Quite something, really. 


Now there’s a link I’m going to put up on my site at the end of the show.  People don’t think that the pharma companies are part of the military-industrial complex.  As I’ve said before, there’s a book called Deadly Allies:  Canada’s Secret War written by a Toronto Star reporter.  Fascinating because he used declassified information from the Canadian, British, and American governments to show that Canada was the lead country for bacterial and viral warfare in World War II and onwards.  In this Stimson, History of the US Offensive Biological Warfare Program you’ll find…


Biological and Chemical Weapons

History of the US Offensive Biological Warfare Program (1941-1973)


August 1942: George Merck (A:  We all know the Merck company.), president of the Merck & Co. pharmaceutical company, accepts the position as head of the newly-created War Research Service (WRS), the coordinating agency that joins government and private institution resources to carry out the US biological warfare program. Headed by a small cadre of well-connected individuals, the WRS begins to conduct research at dozens of American universities.  (A:  Canadian as well and British.) Simultaneously, the WRS encourages the Chemical Warfare Service to expand its examination of biological weapons potential and construct research facilities. The initial allocation in 1942 for the WRS totals $200,000. Meanwhile, the Chemical Warfare Service receives millions of dollars to construct research facilities.


1943: Construction begins on a biological weapons research and development facility at Camp Detrick in Frederick, Maryland. Camp Detrick, which becomes operational that year with about 4,000 personnel, is renamed Fort Detrick in 1956.

(A:  Remember, this is the combined pharma companies that make the vaccines working at the TOP, the TOP of the military-industrial complex dealing with biowarfare.  Why not? They were already experts in viruses and bacteria.  Where else would you go?  That was their job… experimenting with viruses and bacterium.)


January 1943: WRS is running programs to explore the offensive potential of botulinum toxin and anthrax. These two particular agents remain the focus of the offensive program during the remaining World War II years.


(A:  Then it’s got a whole bunch of facts after this and how it expanded and expanded and expanded.  Quite something.)


I’ve even mentioned on previous shows how the big Canadian pharma companies and laboratories, one main one that was dealing with the blood products.  They brought in contaminated blood and blood products to Canada from the US.  They knew it was contaminated.  It was set up in World War II as part of this bio-warfare industry.  There was a CBC documentary on it.  Quite something isn’t it?  They’re all part of it.  These are the ones that want to give us injections.  Bear in mind, on the previous articles I’ve been talking about, they want to reduce the population of the planet drastically.  I’ve given you enough evidence to show you.  These guys are deadly, deadly serious.  Deadly serious.


There’s a good article here by Jeffrey Smith. 


You're Appointing Who? Please Obama, Say It's Not So!

Jeffrey Smith  Posted: July 23, 2009


When the FDA was constructing their GMO policy in 1991-2, their scientists were clear that gene-sliced foods were significantly different and could lead to "different risks" than conventional foods. But official policy declared the opposite, claiming that the FDA knew nothing of significant differences, and declared GMOs substantially equivalent.  (A:  That’s how they passed it into law.  No testing or anything or checking into it.  Substantially equivalent… and that was good enough.  Back in a moment with more on this article after this break.)


This is Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix, tying things together to show you why things really happen.  Right now, I’m talking about the GMO foods being placed… The whole determination of whether the foods were safe to eat was placed entirely in the hands of the companies that made them.  Companies like Monsanto which told us that PCBs, DDT and Agent Orange were safe. That’s Monsanto.  It’s part of the military-industrial complex.  Why is the military-industrial complex in charge of your food supply?  Well, if you make war on the public, what do people need?  Food, water, shelter, clothing, energy.  What’s happening today?  It’s all being taken over by small cliques of people.  It’s a WAR against the people!  That’s why. 


This fiction became the rationale for allowing GM foods on the market without any required safety studies whatsoever! The determination of whether GM foods were safe to eat was placed entirely in the hands of the companies that made them -- companies like Monsanto, which told us that the PCBs, DDT, and Agent Orange were safe.


GMOs were rushed onto our plates in 1996. Over the next nine years, multiple chronic illnesses in the US nearly doubled -- from 7% to 13%. Allergy-related emergency room visits doubled between 1997 and 2002 while food allergies, especially among children, skyrocketed. We also witnessed a dramatic rise in asthma, autism, obesity, diabetes, digestive disorders, and certain cancers. (A:  These things, by the way, they already KNEW, these characters that said it was okay for us to eat, the guys who made the GMO, because they tested it all this out on all different animals and found the same things happening.  Therefore, it tells me this is INTENDED TO HAPPEN.  I don’t believe in these accidents.  This is intended to happen.  Every government is pushing this stuff as a ‘MUST BE’.  A ‘MUST BE’.)


In January of this year, Dr. P. M. Bhargava, one of the world's top biologists, told me that after reviewing 600 scientific journals, he concluded that the GM foods in the US are largely responsible for the increase in many serious diseases.


In May, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine concluded that animal studies have demonstrated a causal relationship between GM foods and infertility (A:  It’s all the warfare goals isn’t it.  Fertility, bring down the population…), accelerated aging, dysfunctional insulin regulation (A:  We see diabetes everywhere.), changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system, and immune problems such as asthma, allergies, and inflammation.


In July, a report by eight international experts determined that the flimsy and superficial evaluations of GMOs by both regulators and GM companies "systematically overlook the side effects" and significantly underestimate "the initial signs of diseases like cancer and diseases of the hormonal, immune, nervous and reproductive systems, among others."


Nothing is by chance.  You don’t get things happening on this scale by chance.  If you truly had governments that really worked for the people – which they never have – they would be investigating all of this because they’d be terrified too.  Well, they’re NOT terrified.  Why?  Because they’re not eating the same crap that you’re eating at the bottom.  They DO have little passports to the good food supplies at the top, that’s part of their little benefits and it also helps to keep them in the club, you see.  They’re very, very faithful to the clubs.


Just one last link.  This is to do with the link between bisphenol-A and what’s happening with insulin.  The estrogen receptor ERα is absolutely connected to pancreatic insulin content regulation.  I’ll put his up on my site as well to show you how all these things interact with each other.  That’s why they put estrogen in all of your plastics and made it a popular thing to do, drink out of plastic bottles. 


Pancreatic Insulin Content Regulation by the Estrogen Receptor ERα




That’s it for tonight.  From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.



Topics of show covered in following links:


"Crispin Tickell" (

"Green group calls for one child policy" AAP ( - April 21, 2009.


"History of the US Offensive Biological Warfare Program (1941-1973)" (at

"You're Appointing Who? Please Obama, Say It's Not So!" by Jeffrey Smith ( - July 23, 2009.

"Pancreatic Insulin Content Regulation by the Estrogen Receptor ERα" [Causal Relationship between Estrogen/Bisphenol-A and Insulin] ( - Published April 30, 2008.



Transcribed by Diana




Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:

"Cutting Through" Volumes 1, 2, 3   &   "Waiting for the Miracle....."

Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)   &   Blurbs and Shows on MP3 CDs

"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"