Sept. 13, 2011 (#918)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 13, 2011:

Learn to "See" with Eyes Anew,
It Will Surely Change Your Point of View:

"Corporations, Academia and Legal Fraternity
All Work Together to Force New Modernity,
Post-Consumerism, Austerity, Public Confused,
While Fat Cats and Moneybags Look on Amused,
They Don't Feel Your Pain, Psychopaths All,
They're Jetting, Feasting, Having a Ball,
Each Peasant Beneath is Just a Toy,
This World's Their Doll House to Build or Destroy,
Yes, for Little People, Living is Now Chaotic,
Unaware the System is Completely Despotic,
Martial Law is Camouflaged, Decreed by Rote,
It Would Take a Miracle to Win by the Vote,
If an Honest Man Won, The Plotters, Agitated,
Would Immediately have Him Assassinated,
Changing to Rights and Freedoms Not Allowed,
Agenda Runs Smoothly, by Keeping Folks Cowed"
© Alan Watt Sept. 13, 2011

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 13, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


cuttingthroughthematrix.com
alternate sites:
cuttingthroughthematrix.net  ,   .us  ,   .ca
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca

mirror site:
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu


Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND –
Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 13th of September 2011.  For newcomers, you should go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  You’ll find hundreds of audios for download for free and hopefully, once you’re finished, if you’ve still got any hair left in your head, you’ll be able to get the big picture of the system that runs the world. And it’s vastly different from the one that you’re trained to believe from childhood, augmented by school and then taken over by media, and then you’re too busy working for a living, chasing the carrot, which never seems to come your way, it’s always a step ahead of you, on the same stick of course, the stick never shortens.  And you rush through your lives never really figuring out that you’re run by a system, a very precise, very old system that really is upgrading itself for the new world order, the new period, the new age if you like, because it has many names all coming from the same source in fact.  So help yourself to the audios.  You’ll find the big corporations, the foundations, that are just the fronts for the big parallel government – that’s what it really is; is a parallel government; Thatcher called it that and so did Carroll Quigley and other members of this big society, the Council on Foreign Relations group and the Royal Institute of International Affairs in the UK.  So they run, basically, the world, the direction that the world goes.  They have hundreds of think tanks working on different aspects of society and they even iron out the problems that the society will face when they implement the next chess move and they also know how to basically avoid it or take it over or even use it; they’re very good at using movements and so on. 

 

So help yourself as I say and you’ll find lots of information there.  Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you so you can help support me, in these low cash flow times, by buying the books and disks I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  You’ll find out how to do it right there.  [Order and donation options listed above.]  Straight donations are really, really awfully welcome right now because people are in a slump, I know that, the whole world is in a slump.  They’ll buy all kinds of things to try and save themselves, hoping to save themselves, but they won’t unfortunately just keep the people going, the few who are telling them the basic truth. 

 

I said yesterday too, you can’t understand an enemy if you purposely avoid learning about the enemy and what it is, and how big it is, and how many of them there are, and all of the big clubs that are joined together and their ‘circles of friends’, as they like to call it, because as I say, they map the future out, like they’ve mapped out the last 100 years actually, according to Quigley.  In the 60s when he wrote his book Tragedy and Hope and he also turned out a very good book, The Anglo-American Establishment, the guys who planned the future that we’re living in today, including the wars by the way, he goes into some of that.  Then you’ll find out that the whole world is scripted in advance, including the massive changes and upheavals the society will be forced to go through, not because of circumstances, not because of happenstance and just oddball chaos that comes out of the blue.  It’s planned that way because even in war time you can get more done in 5 years of war: the social system, the government takes it over, takes over everything, the food industry, everything, and subsidizes corporations in times of war.  You can get more done on a social level in 5 years of war than 50 years using propaganda in a time of peace; and that’s what Quigley said too.  So you have perpetual war now and you’re supposed to just ride through it and say, ooh, aah, look at that, look at this, look at that, a thousand stories every day but you got to keep your eyes on what’s really happening.  Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks, we’re back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.  We’re living in a system very much like the matrix where there’s lots of rooms, lots of levels, there’s gatekeepers to every level, and every big room in fact, and each time you arrive in a room you think you’ve arrived totally and that’s it, there’s nothing left beyond that, only to find out there’s another back door that goes on and on and on.  And that’s the system.  It’s compartmentalized, they call it at the top.  Everything is compartmentalized.  Many of the associations which work for this world order, while rewarding the players very, very well indeed, they keep them at their level of understanding; they don’t have to know any more.  And you know, that’s the way you get on in this real world, in government or civil service, bureaucracies, or CIA, anything like that, or even the police force.  It’s knowing when not to ask questions.  You just obey.  Very Masonic in fact, because Masons are sworn to obey a superior officer’s command and put all their moral reservations to the side, completely; they mustn’t interfere with it and they must carry out that command immediately.  So that’s how the system is literally run.  Those are the ones that get ahead in the world.  The ones that say that’s not quite right or you ask some questions about it, well they don’t trust you quite as much and you will be left hanging at that level or perhaps demoted or kicked out the door. 

 

We’re living through a world of globalization and it’s been like that for a long time.  We’ve watched the World Trade Organization, those that can remember, when they signed through the GATT treaty and how, literally, every government that signed onto it guaranteed all manufacturing, that if they moved off to China they’d pay for their transportation and all their goods and tooling, set them up in China, using your tax money, and pay them even any losses they claimed they incurred during the transit and setup, and even 10 years beyond which could be renewed for another 10 years.  And well, who wouldn’t jump at that, eh?  Especially when you’re going to get cheap labor in China.  And China guaranteed them, too, no taxes on their side for about 10-15 years.  So everyone was approached by government reps to just up and move.  That was the deal, to make China THE manufacturer for the planet. 

 

Now, those who designed this system, all your politicians, bureaucrats, the State Department especially, and the Foreign Affairs Department in other counties, they are the ones that deal with other countries, diplomacy and tradable goods, etc.  So they were all in on this big act.  They knew it was going to have a drastic effect back in the countries that were losing all the factories and all the work.  Of course, they’ve set nothing up to replace it, if you’ve noticed.  Well, that was the deal, as they bring you down. Because the US especially, and Canada too, will eventually collapse into the very system they helped – through the United Nations and NATO – create across the world.  That’s the deal.  As we bring them up to a higher standard we plummet down and we’re supposed to meet in some happy medium in between.  That’s why we’re still building hospitals in China and China’s out-producing every country on the planet right now, and rolling in the dough; they’ve got more multi-billionaires created every year than any other country.  But that’s the trade deal, you see. 

 

Anyway, there’s nothing but service economies.  Now, Britain was the first one because Britain leads the charge, or London I should say, leads the charge in most things which other countries copy.  That’s all part of the deal, with this international interlocking CFR type, Royal Institute of International Affairs order that you live in.  In fact, the CFR has its own branch running the whole of Europe, the European Parliament; all the top members are members of the European International Affairs group run by London too.  And the bankers run it; that’s who formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs in the first place.  I’m not talking about your corner bankers.  I’m talking about the guys who lend money, supposedly, to countries so they can print up cash and cause inflation and then who end up buying the bonds at massive interest rates from the very guys that they lent the cash to.  It’s a circle of intrigue indeed. 

 

Now, this article here is from the Council on Foreign Relations.  Remember, it’s the outer party that writes the stuff for the general public and they’re allowed to say certain things.  Because under the Chatham House Rules or the Pratt Rules in the US, Harold Pratt Building where they hold their meetings, they say that they must never discuss the topics, definitely not the names of those involved at the inner circle meetings.  But they’re allowed to say some of the topics for the general public and it’s very vague, always; it’s never in detail.  It’s just generalized stuff.  And it says here in this article here on globalization, the effects of it.  This is a recent article, they wrote many before it, because they knew they were going to bring in mass unemployment.  It talks here about, if you scroll down this article which I’ll put up the link tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. 

 

Globalization and Unemployment

The Downside of Integrating Markets

viet-studies.info/kinhte/MichaelSpence_Globalization_Unemployment.pdf / Michael Spence / June 2, 2011

 

At the same time, many job opportunities in the United States are shifting away from the sectors that are experiencing the most growth and to those that are experiencing less. The result is growing disparities in income and employment across the U.S. economy, with highly educated workers enjoying more opportunities and workers with less education facing declining employment prospects and stagnant incomes. (Alan:  Because they used to work in factories, a lot of folk worked in factories.  They don’t like universities; it’s just not for them.  But they could be very good employees in manufacturing.)  The U.S. government must urgently develop a long-term policy (A:  Well, the government’s not supposed to be in the business of creating or hindering commerce or business, but of course they are these days.) to address these distributional effects and their structural underpinnings and restore competitiveness and growth to the U.S. economy.  (A:  Now, you can go into the old books on economics and you’ll find out why, and every country said this in their courses, why the US really boomed ahead from the 1800s right through the 20th century, a good part of the 20th century.  It was because they did not have the massive bureaucracies and interference of agencies, of the other established old countries, in Europe for instance.  They just didn’t have all of the paperwork, all of the laws and rules to follow.  They simply boomed ahead and made things happen.  When a country or a government wants to bring you down they simply create agencies and fees and fines for everything that you try to do until if you own even a store half your day is working trying to fill in forms for the government.  That’s what happened in Britain until there’s very little private business left now.)

 

JOBLESS IN THE U.S.

Between 1990 and 2008, the number of employed workers in the United States grew from about 122 million to about 149 million. (A:  Now, that’s the ones that got work and then a lot more didn’t get work, and a lot of them died off or retired too.)  Of the roughly 27 million jobs created during that period, 98 percent (A:  98%!...) were in the so-called nontradable sector of the economy, the sector that produces goods and services (A:  ...a service economy.  You know, you buy pies and then a middle man get them, and then you sell them at other places that are the outlets for the pies. You pass things around.  Or you import stuff and pass them around, the service economy.) that must be consumed domestically. The largest employers in the U.S. nontradable sector were the government (A:  ...the largest employers.  Well, 9/11 you see, and a totalitarian system, and lots of special branches and forces and so on, all working within your government, and spies and all the rest of it.) (with 22 million jobs in 2008) (A:  ... 22 million government jobs...) and the health-care industry (with 16 million jobs in 2008). Together, the two industries created ten million new jobs between 1990 and 2008, or just under 40 percent of total additions. (The retail, construction, and hotel and restaurant industries also contributed significantly to job growth.) (A:  Again, service economies.)  Meanwhile, employment barely grew in the tradable sector of the U.S. economy, the sector that produces goods and services that can be consumed anywhere, such as manufactured products, engineering, and consulting services. That sector, which accounted for more than 34 million jobs in 1990, grew by a negligible 600,000 jobs between 1990 and 2008. 

 

So, it’s a fairly lengthy little article but I’ll put it up and you can read it for yourselves.  Because none of this is a surprise to this guy, obviously, because he was in at the meetings I’m sure, before they gave you the World Trade Organization’s GATT treaty and shipped all the jobs off.  That’s what they give out to the public for the outer party.  You see, there’s always an inner party and an outer party.  I’m also putting up a link tonight to do with bankruptcies, store closings, and it’s called Daily Job Cuts, Layoff News.  Quite interesting to go over the States and see what’s all closing down, or has closed down, or have decided they’re going to close down or lay off.  It’s a very, very good site.

 

dailyjobcuts.com

 

Now, certain people in every generation, you know they’re deemed to be put up into a higher pedestal than their competitors in politics, etc.  You just know who they are. And in Canada some of them never even get elected; they’re just appointed.  Anyway, in Australia you’ve got the Fabian Society that’s run Australia for many, many years.  And the Fabian Society is one of the hard-line societies, or parties you might call it, that runs what they think is the far left.  And that’s what, really, professors have talked about before, that often the Fabian Society, which works for the CFR and Royal Institute of International Affairs, and they deal with the left-wing, they were often mistaken for communists.  Because you see, the bankers set up the two wings.  When they created the Royal Institute of International Affairs they created the ones that would do, for their own class you see, the ones who’d do all the work and be up there in politics, hard-line, and into the House of Lords or Senates in other countries.  And then they also give the one for the left-wing, which is a hard Marxist type agenda, because they love to bring in the one system comprising of the two parts.  The left-wing brings in big government, lots of rules, regulations, and things which stymie the economy and really persecute the people on a lower level, with all their rules, regulations.  So they work together.

 

And Julia Gillard in Australia has obviously been groomed and picked for this position now.  It’s interesting too, that the Marxists always said that, you always lie to the public to get into office, once you’re in it doesn’t matter what you do.  Even Pierre Trudeau said that and he was a communist; he was the leader of the Comintern party that went over in 1952 to the Moscow Comintern meeting, and that was the Communist International for young communists and so on.  And he said the same thing, once you get into power you can do what you want – and he actually made a little speech about that, a little sly speech that some people missed when he did get into power – by any means possible.  So lying is very acceptable to the public and if they start off that way before they’re in, what do you think they’re going to do once they are in?  Back with more after this break.

 

Hi, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about Australia and how the Fabian Society have run it for a long time.  The Fabians are also part of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, as the right-wing think tanks are as well.  Go into the Fabian Society, look at its history; it’s quite fascinating, the players in it. And they started off the whole thing for not just women’s rights but to get them into the workforce, etc; and it literally doubled the tax base.  The big boys aren’t stupid. 

 

Here’s Julia Gillard, I’ll call her Gillard instead of Jillard because I’m not sure which you call her; I’m sure she’s been called lots of things.  Anyway it says here that she’s been chosen to push the carbon taxes, to be the first big one to push the carbon taxes in what’s called the Commonwealth, the British Commonwealth Nations.  Of course, that was London’s job to tell her to do that of course.   And she’s a very ambitious lady.  She also had a visit recently from the group, I think it was the group from the United Nations to do with the weather, you know, changeable weather they call it.  This is what really she’s about.  She’s groomed to be a star regardless of the chaos she creates in the meantime.  Now, they wanted to initially hit the big companies that they claimed were producing carbon, but believe you me, if you read through all the stuff that’s been published on this, they want to bring it down to the individual.  This is to eventually, literally, monitor and tax the individual.  As I said before, all of your disposable income will go to pay taxes and fees and fines and so on, for all energy and the carbon output.  It says here...

 

Australian PM Julia Gillard presents carbon tax bill

bbc.co.uk / 13 September 2011

 

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has presented her bill for a controversial carbon tax to parliament.

 

The legislation would force about 500 of the biggest polluters to pay for each tonne of carbon dioxide they emit.  (A:  They’ve actually got scales for it.  It’s quite interesting; you breathe on it and it sinks, you know, clang... $10,000.)

 

The tax is central to the government's strategy to combat climate change (A:  That’s, you know, changeable weather.), but the opposition say it will cause job losses and raise the cost of living.

 

Thousands of Australians have protested against the bill, accusing Ms Gillard of lying before last year's election.  (A:  Well that’s what politicians do.)

 

Ms Gillard made a pledge during last year's federal election not to introduce a carbon tax.  (A:  Well, they all lie.  I mean, we had two Prime Ministers in succession in Canada that promised not to go ahead with the NAFTA deal, because it would destroy Canada, but each one, one after the other, and years apart, when they actually got in, within two weeks they changed their minds, completely, and then the news headlines said that oh, Chretien is now the champion of NAFTA and I think Mulroney did the same.)

 

The proposed tax was drawn up after Ms Gillard failed to win an overall majority in parliament at the polls and had to rely on the support of the Australian Greens.

 

The bills will undergo a month of consideration before a final vote on 12 October. 

 

(A:  By the way, the average politician has got one minute, exactly, to speak on it.  That’s it.  It’s to be rammed through.  It’s a joke.)

 

Carbon tax debate will run for equivalent of one minute per MP per bill

Lanai Vasek / theaustralian.com.au / September 13, 2011

 

(A:   Anyway, that’s Australia that’s going to be hammered to be an example to us all. And remember, all taxes on corporations are passed onto the consumer at the bottom; you know that yourself.  We all know that.  The same with any kind of taxes, it goes the same way.  And meanwhile, the big corporations will probably do as the Europeans did. The EU parliament gave the European corporations millions of dollars’ worth each in tradable taxes, or carbon credits to get them all started.  Many of them made profits off it.  The only people who got suckered were the public.  Well, there’s nothing new in that at all, is there?  Anyway she says...)

 

PROPOSED CARBON TAX

To start on 1 July 2012

500 companies affected

Agriculture, forestry and land are exempt (A:  Because they’re all carbon sinks of course.  Unless you got some hay hanging outside; that’s a pollutant they claim.)

Compensation for polluters

Market-based trading scheme kicks in from 2015 (A:  So they want to trade the carbon credits, etc.)

Target to cut 159m tonnes of CO2 by 2020 (A:  And I understand they’ve revived Merlin the magician to figure out how it’s done, because it’s all bogus and utter rot.)

 

BUT it’s a control mechanism.  That’s what it’s really for.  I think it was Anne McLellan that was in the Canadian government a few years ago, and I’ve mentioned the different ones who let it out of the bag, what the carbon taxes and so on were all for, and global warming. And she says, well, it doesn’t matter even if global warming is all a scam, it will bring equality to the world. See, all the cash, the extra cash they’re going to garnish off all the public will be used to throw across third world countries, which will get put into the international corporations that have branches in those countries, not to the public, you understand; it never happens that way. But that’s the nonsense we travel through.  So there she admitted it right away, even if it’s all bogus it will bring equality, which is the big goal.  It’s amazing, these guys talk about equality, you notice all these Marxists end up incredibly stinking rich?  Have you noticed that? 

 

I was looking the other day at Barroso, I’ll put that link up too at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, where you’ll hear him talk about the European Parliament and he calls it an empire.  We should really start looking at it like what it really is.  It’s an empire, he says.  He had everything on except, you know, the oak leaves on his head.  I’ll also put a link up too, where you’ll see him as a young student, a Marxist student; he called himself a Maoist at the time, but a Marxist student.  And I thought to myself, these are the guys that push hard left and we’ll all be the same, and here they are with multi-millions of dollars at the top.  See, communism’s an awful profitable thing if you are chosen to get up to the top.  You know, lots of cash and loot and perks.  Back with more after this break.

 

Barroso: European Union is 'empire' (short version) - youtube.com

 

Barroso as a young, passionate Maoist student leader in 1976 - youtube.com

 

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about, really, left-wing, right-wing. Remember they’re always attached to the same bird; they can’t fly without the two wings.  And generally they’ve got a shield over the body so you can’t really see who’s behind it, or who’s sneaking around in there.  And that’s not by coincidence either. 

 

Anyway, they’ve always said at the top that you got to grab the children young, and to get any indoctrination, any kind of indoctrination into their minds.  Jesuits have said it.  Others have said it.  Behavioral scientists have said the same thing:  get them before the age of 7 and you can make them into anything that you want them to be. They will believe it; in fact they’ll have an almost impossible time trying to discard the imprinting on their minds that was put into them.  Especially when they’re watching lots of videos, where they use a kind of psychodrama in a sense and psychological techniques with neurolinguistics, psycholinguistics in a sense, with music in the background, and when something really horrible happens, a little animal gets killed, you hear the doom-doom, doom-doom and generally a woman’s voice over the background hypnotizes you and that imprints on the mind.  General advertising uses that too.  So you should be very careful when you’re being manipulated by music.  Very powerful.  Very potent thing. 

 

Anyway, you got to grab them young and here’s an article from Toronto, because it will go nationwide and maybe if they’ve not got it in the States already; I think they actually have courses like this in the States and elsewhere. 

 

Scientist helps students adapt to climate change

Toronto school board develops climate-change course with Environment Canada

By Max Paris, Environment Unit / cbc.ca / Sep 9, 2011

 

Toronto high school students are being encouraged to wreak environmental havoc on imaginary populations — with the goal of learning more about adapting to (A:  Changes in the weather, or they call it...) climate change.

 

A new course, called "Studying Climate Change, Health and Adaptation," began as a workshop for high school students but is now part of the curriculum.

 

It was created by Brad Bass, an Environment Canada climate scientist (A:  So he makes his money off the bogus nonsense.) who works out of the University of Toronto's Centre for Environment. The course was built around a computer program (A:  You know, these computer programs will always give you scary scenarios.) he developed called COBWEB (A:  This is what they’re calling it, COBWEB.), for Complexity and Organized Behaviour Within Environmental Bounds.  (A:  It’s a big study of course too, because these children will grow up with more restrictions on them than any previous generation.)

 

The program allows students to create a population living in a certain environment and then change that environment to see how the population reacts over a period of time. For example, students can create an extreme heat event in a large city with limited cooling centres. They can adjust the age and health makeup of the population and then see what happens to them during the hot spell.

 

Using the program, students can watch a week-long scenario progress over a matter of minutes or seconds.

 

"It (COBWEB) allows them to do what I would call 'what-if' scenarios," (A:  That’s very much like what the government does on everything.  Their think tanks, you know, what if, and known unknowns, and known knowns, and unknown knowns, and all that stuff that we’ve heard before coming from the top of government.) explained Bass, adding, "we have a lot of questions. What if we do this, or what if we do that? And a computer model helps anybody explore that question."  (A:  So it’s a kind of make-believe thing but it won’t be presented that way.  It’s to get the idea of, oh we’re always in crisis, where anything could happen; you know a comet could come in and hit you any minute, and stuff like that, you see.)

 

The Toronto District School Board and Bass developed the course module with the idea of making the material available to school boards across the country.

 

"We are going to put it up on our website and it will be available as a PDF [computer file] to any school in the country … to any school in the world, for that matter," says Stephan Bibla (A:  Sounds megalomaniac there, doesn’t it?), science and technology program co-ordinator for the Toronto District School Board.

 

Paul Hackl is excited about the climate change lesson plan. The Grade 12 geography teacher at Toronto's Riverdale Collegiate helped design it. He also asked Bass to conduct the workshop with his students. 

 

It’s a sad thing, isn’t it, when they grab youngsters and make sure that the next generation growing up already will flow into it and adapt; they’ve already been adapted in school and they’ll think you’re crazy if you say, well you know, technically the weather goes up and down like a yo-yo and it always has.  It always has.  It did it, too, long before.  They go on about their end-of-life-extinctions and I think Prince Charles made some comment about that a week ago in some speech that his scriptwriter made for him.  You understand, there have been so many end-of-life-extinctions.  We don’t even know them all, but they put 5 down I think; almost like the 5 root races of Masonry, you know, higher Masonry.  And the first few, there were no men around at the time; no humans around... nothing to do with what they did, lighting little fires and things.  Maybe it was all that CO2 from these big, big lizards and stuff that walked across the planet, eh?  Who knows. 

 

Anyway, they’re blaming carbon dioxide now because you see, you’re a carbon-based lifeform and if you allow them to put laws and restrictions over you, you are an abject slave.  You are a lifeform based on carbon, carbon based.  Do you understand what they’re doing?  They’re owning you. They’re owning you with your consent.  That’s what they’re doing.  Every other creature gives it off too; they’re paying nothing.  And since you’re another creature – according to them you’re another animal, that’s what they say – well you have the right of every other animal to go around freely and breathe as much as you want and consume as much as you want to, to survive.  That’s the law of nature.  But of course they won’t allow us to do all of that. 

 

And another article too, before I go to the callers, is to do with, again, poverty. 

 

Record poverty last year as household income dips

Median household income declines; families ‘doubled up’

marketwatch.com / Sept. 13, 2011 / Ruth Mantell

 

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — A record number of people were in poverty last year as households saw their income decrease, according to data from the Census Bureau Tuesday, demonstrating the weakness of the economy even after the official end of the recession.

 

The 46.2 million people in poverty in 2010 was the most for the 52 years that estimates have been published, and the number of people in poverty rose for the fourth consecutive year as the poverty rate climbed to 15.1% — the highest since 1993 — up from 14.3% in 2009.

 

 Meanwhile, real median household income in 2010 was $49,445, down 2.3% from the prior year and below pre-recession levels.   (A:  So I’ll put that up too and you can have a little dekko – dekko is another little word for a look or a keek, a wee keek at that – for yourselves.  Not that you don’t know it; I’m sure a lot of you are already suffering from it. There’s no doubt about that.)

 

And we’ll see who’s on the list now for callers; I have to refresh this site here and it’s just going now.  There’s Carlton in New York.  Are you there Carlton?

 

Carlton:  Hey, Mr Watt.  How you doin’? 

 

Alan:  Not too bad at all.

 

Carlton:  Alright.  As you know, everything is going on in New York for the 10th anniversary of 9/11, and Friday... Well, you know I’m involved with a group in the city here.  But Friday we actually had a few protests going on around the city.  We hit the CFR.  We actually went to the UN, right.  Now, you were touching on, pretty much, Friday and yesterday that we are international.  And Friday we got a smack in the face on that because we actually... We went through the procedures and all that, got sound permits and all that good stuff, right.  And of course you know, in the United States, we got the free speech zones.  So when we left the CFR and we were there with no consequence; the police were pretty cool.  We went to the UN.  When we went to the UN the cops said they had a spot down the street for us.  But we’re supposed to have freedom of assembly, so we went in front of the UN.  And we were there, we set up, and eventually the cops came and they was like, we had this spot set up for you down the street.  But they actually said – and we got this on camera – that they actually said that this is international sidewalk.  [Caller laughing.]

 

Alan:  That’s right.

 

Carlton:  Then later on, we actually, we fought ’em a little bit, but we actually moved, you know...  But when we talked to them again the cop actually told me, I didn’t say that.  I was like, really?...  Like, you just going to lie to me in my face?  And that’s like the thing that makes me mad about all of this the most, is that you talk to me like I’m an idiot.  You tell me one thing and then you tell me something else.  And that’s what makes me angry.  Like, don’t try to play me for no fool.  I’m not the smartest man in the world but I’m sure not an idiot.  But yeah, just to anybody who didn’t know, we are international, if you haven’t already figured it out.

 

Alan:  That’s right. And also, when the G20 was in Toronto, it’s up there on YouTube, where you hear the cops telling protesters they can’t cross this particular area or go so many feet towards the fence that they had constructed, because it was now international territory.  The same thing.  They can make anything international by some whim or some judge in the sky somewhere; I don’t know where it comes from.  This is the new tactic they’re using.  But it is true that the Rockefeller family donated that land to the United Nations for its construction.  Now the public were never involved in that at all, they were never even given the right to vote should they even have the United Nations, and they plonked the thing in New York there.  It used to be a slaughterhouse; it was a kosher slaughterhouse, one of the largest, really, in the States.  So it was well bloodied for its purpose and so they built the thing there.  So why is an international building, how can it have sovereign status in the middle of a country? 

 

Carlton:  Exactly. 

 

Alan:  I mean, were any Americans consulted?  Well, no.

 

Carlton:  And it was people actually outside of the UN, like at a bus stop, and they were watching.  But it’s like these people don’t even know what the heck is going on even, or they actually were working in the UN in some capacity, I don’t know.  But I mean, just on the fact of the whole 9/11 anniversary, like they actually weren’t even letting people who had on ‘investigate 9/11’ shirts near the memorial on Sunday.  So yeah, it was total lockdown this weekend.  But that’s really all I had to say and I’ll holler back at you.

 

Alan:  At least you’re trying and that’s the main thing.

 

Carlton:  Alright.

 

Alan:  Thanks for calling.

 

Carlton:  Take it easy now.

 

Alan:  You too.

 

Carlton:  Alright.

 

Alan:  And that’s the key to it.  You got to try, even though it’s awfully frustrating because you find nothing is as it appears to be.  When you go to buildings and then they’re sovereign status and of course, under sovereign status they can make their own rules and if you try to enter that doorway or whatever, and simply kick you out or arrest you even.  It would be interesting to see them arresting people.  Who’s going to arrest you?  Under whose law?  International law or is it going to be the UN’s law?  Is it a sovereign little nation there or what?  Nothing’s explained to us.  Most folk don’t need to have anything explained; they just accept it: Well it’s always been there and I guess it’s quite natural... and that’s how it is.  But there’s no doubt about it, the UN literally has an equivalent of every department you have in the US federal government; it has all kinds – and the states too.  It has planning departments, all kinds of departments, and that’s where all your laws and regulations really come from to do with you.  Now, there’s Dave in Arizona there too.  Are you there Dave?

 

Dave:  Hey, how are ya?

 

Alan:  I’m doing okay.  Hangin’ in.

 

Dave:  I understand that basically now the United States is a corporate fascist state based on the fact that the people don’t want wars, and we have multiple wars, and people don’t want the bailouts and they do the bailouts anyway.   So obviously the corporations are running the country and owning the politicians.  I guess the other question I have for you, because I understand the corporate control, do these NGO groups represent the corporations also?

 

Alan:  Absolutely.  The NGOs, you understand, the tactic that they use, it’s always to help the poor; generally it’s the poor in other countries.  But it’s not really that at all.  It’s to bring in this same system of bureaucracies across other countries; that’s really what it’s about.  If you notice too, the NGOs, even the green ones, are awful particular about who they protest.  Lots of ones, big ones, they will NOT protest.  You don’t see the mass marches against the wars going on in the streets; these are the guys who would supposedly do it at one time.  But no, they’re very selective, so they get orders from above.  And the NGOs are not little charities walking around with a tin can door to door.  They have full-time employees at the top with their own office buildings and their skyscrapers.  All their computer stuff is supplied to them, their trained technicians are supplied to them, they have pensions, they have fantastic wages.  You understand, a non-governmental organization, all you do is set up a board and then of course you say, we’re non-profit, you get your little ticket from the government and then you can award the cash that comes in as salaries to your CEO of it and second in command.  You can give them as much as you want; $100,000, $200,000 a year, doesn’t matter.  There’s no limit to what you can actually give them; so they’re riding high. These are professional people who literally leave university and get the little wink and the nod and they’re in there like a shot.  And they can spend their whole lives in there.  So it’s actually like a parallel... they’re all part of the parallel government along with the corporations.  Now, the corporations, as Carroll Quigley said, will be the new... they’ll act like the feudal overlords in this new feudal-corporate system.  And that’s what you’re in already.  You’re in it already.  It’s been here for quite some time.  And governments are almost secondary now because you have to go into politics, out of politics, into the foundations, the parallel government, and back and forth, back and forth.  We see this happening with politicians all the time.  It’s all one system now, but it’s private. 

 

Dave:  Well yeah, because it’s obvious that the corporations are... I mean, the control factor is basically out of the closet.  Where at one time here in America they tried to hide the control and now they’re open about it. 

 

Alan:  Yes.  Rockefeller himself, he did say that; he made his famous little speech and it’s up on the net somewhere, I might find it, I don’t know, for tonight.  He said, it was far preferable that the world be run by bankers and big business, corporations, rather than leave self-determination to the individual sovereign nations.  That’s what he said.  That was in, I think, after the same speech he gave, about he was often accused of being a communist, a fascist, this and that, and then he said, he’s for world sovereignty.  World, he’s for the world, globalism, he says, if I’m accused of all these things then I am guilty and quite proud of it.  So he’s been working constantly, his whole life, as were his family, his relatives before him, to bring in this corporate structure. And of course, the Rockefellers were placed in America by others that place bankers too, and other people, that would definitely take over the whole economy.

 

Dave:  So is the ultimate goal then to basically turn the US into Mexico?

 

Alan:  Ultimately it will be like that.  If you just put it together; the thing is to put the pieces together.  And when you get the think tank for NATO and the think tank for the US military – and I’ve got them both in the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com; you should read them – projecting for the next 40 years or so.  They both said that eventually as the populations kind of die away... they have this big thing, we’re just going to suddenly drop in population; they’re quite right because they’ve given us all cancers by the way.  They said, eventually there’ll be a few very high tech city-states left.  America will no longer be America.  Even across Europe, it will no longer be Mr Barroso’s empire.  It’ll be a few high tech, very high tech city-states with the important, necessary people to maintain that city-state.  In other words, they don’t need thousands or millions of laboring classes or semiskilled workers, etc.  So this is the future they envisage once the countries melt away.  And not only that, they said that even the global government system will only be temporary, before the city-states will rise to their true prominence, a few of them across the globe.  Now, these are your top think tanks for the military.  Hold on and we’ll be back after this break.

 

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, just talking to Dave from Arizona on how you must really connect things together.  That’s the whole key to everything, is connecting the different parts of all of this to show you the whole, to show you what it’s all really about rather than get hung up on what they’re doing to us today.  Tomorrow it will be a thousand more articles across the net, which they control too, to make sure they’re out there to distract you and keep you angry or emotionally upset with what they’ve done to this poor soul and that poor soul, etc.  That’s the side effects of this big machine rolling ahead.  All of the things you see, cops attacking people and so on, that’s the side effects of it.  And you can’t get stuck on that.  You got to see the big machine above it and where it’s supposed to go.  When your top think tanks for the military – and I’ll put the links up tonight again – actually say that, that eventually you’ll be stuck in regions and the population is to drastically fall going up to the year 2040, and a massive decline, even in China, by the year 2045-2050. They didn’t say why it’s going to decline, but I read an article the other day where the World Health Organization said the big scare now is, oh the up-and-coming countries – the third world countries, now that money’s flowing in, etc – there’s going to be a massive cancer problem.  That’s what they said.  Well of course there is because you see, they’ve already been in with their injections, inoculations or vaccines, to make sure.

 

DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007 - 2036

 

Dave:  SV-40.

 

Alan:  That’s right.  Oh, much, much more than that.  They’re even more developed now, sterilization of course, with the injections.  And the food, yeah, that will also sterilize them.  And Rockefeller also has his Golden Rice out that way now and that was studied by the UN.  And they actually admitted in an article that it definitely, it cuts back on the sperm count of males; it makes them less reproductive.  So we’re getting played with all the time on a massive scale.  Tie it all together and you can see why they’re talking about their lovely golden age they hope to have by around the year 2050 with their big domed cities, city-states basically, with a small essential population.  In other words, all the useless eaters from the old age, the old industrial age, etc, will be gone.  That’s what they’re really telling you.

 

Dave:  Alan, do you think it will be like Soylent Green, where basically you reach the age of 65 or 70 and they just kill you off?

 

Alan:  They’re already... I’ve got articles here, and I’ve been reading them over the years, but there’s articles here where they’re bringing in euthanasia in different countries.  When you see it getting pushed and suggested by big people, this is an agenda.  This IS an agenda, it’s just not what they think themselves.  It’s a coordinated agenda.  And it could be across the whole world, maybe 10 different people from different countries saying the same things at the same time; that’s when you know they’re all working together, through repetition, just like ‘weapons of mass destruction’.

 

Dave:  If you think about it, I mean, everything you say makes perfect sense.  Because basically here in the States, and I’m sure it’s like this in a lot of places, but they make it almost impossible or very uncomfortable to travel, if you look at the TSA and what’s going on there.  And basically that’s why they’re talking about, you know, the lack of resources and so forth, and then that way they can do their population scheme.  Because you know, they say, well there’s not enough resources so we got to get rid of so many people.

 

Alan:  Also, the thing is too, if you go through the states that allow, and the countries that allow euthanasia, read through their charters.  They also have stuck in there, the people, if they’re so depressed and fed up with life they should be allowed to go in and end it too.  Now, we’re going through 40 years of turmoil.  We’re already in it, at the beginnings of it; it’s to get a lot worse.  They can make life such hell that people will eventually start flocking in and they’ll say I’ve had enough, I’ve had enough.  They have nothing to look forward to, except the same misery.

 

Dave:  Don’t give up.

 

Alan:  Yep.  That’s it.  That’s their agenda.  I’m not kidding.

 

Dave:  Thanks a lot Alan.

 

Alan:  Thanks for calling.

 

Remember folks, help buy the books and disks I’ve got for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  Donate as well.  I blew 2 monitors, 1 computer and the battery backup, all in one week; they just went zzzz and that was it.  And I’m already scraping along.  It’s up to you.  I can go one way or another, whichever. 

 

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Globalization and Unemployment---Foreign Affairs/CFR

Layoff News

Gillard Presents Carbon Tax Bill

Debate on Carbon Tax Restricted

Barroso says EU is a New Empire

Barroso as Young Marxist Student-Lisbon

Canadian Curriculum teaches "Climate Change" with Scary Scenarios

US--Record Poverty Last Year

"DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007-2036" [PDF file, 6 MB] (U.K. Department of Defence Document).

 


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:

BOOKS

"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3

&

"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)

CDs

Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)

&

Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)

DVDs

"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"