Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN: "Fascism Weds Socialism Begets Fascocialism - For A "Brave New World" "

October 17, 2007 (#26)

ALAN WATT

"CUTTING THROUGH THE MATRIX"

LIVE ON RBN

Title Copyright Alan Watt October 17, 2007:

"FASCISM WEDS SOCIALISM BEGETS FASCOCIALISM —

FOR A "BRAVE NEW WORLD" "
© Alan Watt October 17, 2007

Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - October 17, 2007 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)

WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen

There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on

Is the truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on

Well you walk with your eyes open
But your lips they remain sealed
While the promises we made are broken
Beneath the truth we fear to reveal
Now I need to know now darlin'
I need to know what's goin' on so c'mon

I don't know what happened there, but I'm not in charge of the music. This is Alan Watt on Cutting Through the Matrix on October 17th, 2007.

I always suggest for newcomers to look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com for lots of histories on how the world is being taken step by step through wars and through a chessboard game to the global system of fascism, which is showing its fists right now. The iron glove or the fist is there underneath the velvet glove and the velvet glove is torn in shatters. I also ask people to look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for downloadable transcripts in the various languages of Europe.

When I talk about fascism, I'm not kidding because people should realize and study and look into this system and the various systems that have discussed about 40, 50 years ago – fascism, communism and all the isms, because they all really come from the same roots. Going through Charles Darwin and the ‘survival of the fittest’ throwing religion out the window, which is about the only thing that really kept it under wraps. They had to put some show of some sort of welfare out there for religious purposes. That was done away with too, pretty well under the fascist system we've been living under. Fascism is really the merger of corporate interests with politics, and we've been under this system for a long time, including the European countries in fact. It goes back a long ways and there's nothing new.

People today who are coming out of school seem to think that democracy has always been here. We never really had it and it's not here anyway. The reality is corporate interests always came first. If you look into politicians, you'll find that they either have been all involved as corporate CEOs or affiliated with them and they're in and out of politics and back to the CEO positions like musical chairs. That's called fascism. The corporate powers dictate and tell us all which direction we're heading into, it's not hard to guess, it's a totalitarian system where as they've said in their own writings over many years that we'll be run by experts.

The average person will be born, if they have a need for you that is. If they don't have a need for you, you won't be born. You'll be trained in a position to serve the world state. Look into the United Nations charter and the United Nations talks about this “serving.” It's all to do with service. Now I'll be back after the following messages. I hope the music doesn't go in a loop.

"Everybody Knows" by Leonard Cohen

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the fight was fixed
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt back with Cutting Through the Matrix. Now before I forget, I should thank those people who have sent donations to keep me going because it does keep me going. That's about all that does really keep me going. The printing of the books and all the rest of it pretty well just pays for itself, the costs of postage and all the rest tucked into it. For overseas people who order, remember to tack on $28 or $29 at least for airmail if you're ordering all three books because that's what it costs for posting them by airmail.

The last time I was on I mentioned – some caller talked about Tuesdays and why Tuesdays were so relevant with the stock market et cetera and things happening in Tuesday and major occurrences in the world. I mentioned about Thursday. I got Tuesday and Thursdays mixed up. Thursday is Thor’s day for sure. Tuesday is actually from Tuesday [Tewesday or Tiwes daeg], which is the God of War. Every day of the week really is to do with war, even Wednesday because you have it with Mercredi. Mercury of course is the messenger, is also the saint for corporate interests and mercenaries, so merchants and mercenaries who go hand in hand in all ages, just to clear that up.

Tonight I'm going to talk about the European Union, because it's the precursor for the rest of the blocks, these big trading blocks to follow. I'm going to read a little bit from Sir James Goldsmith's book. Sir James Goldsmith was a man who helped champion the British corporate interests for years. He was all for the union for many years and worked hard towards it. He pulled out towards the end when he saw the direction in which it was going and he formed a society to try to pull Britain back out of the union. He was just getting popular and he came across to the U.S. and spoke to the U.S. Senate, warning them in one of the most eloquent speeches I've ever heard, fantastic orator, warning them of all the dangers that lay ahead and what they'd go through if they had the NAFTA agreement and the GATT agreement go through. All the senators agreed with him but they all voted to go along with it anyway, which tells you who was putting money in their pockets: the big corporate interests.

James Goldsmith suddenly came down with a fast acting cancer of I think it was the pancreas, a very popular one for assassinating people, and he died within about four or five weeks of diagnosis.

His book is called "The Trap." Sir James Goldsmith has a question and answer with a man called Yves Messarovitch who was the Economics Editor of Le Figaro. On page 68 of this book, I'll read a little bit here. Here's what it said. It's what James Goldsmith says:

"Maastricht…"

Alan: That's where they signed the agreement for basically to bring in the whole of Europe together under this fascist system.

"Maastricht seeks to create a supranational, centralized, bureaucratic state…"

Alan: Now remember the U.S. and Canada and Latin American countries have to follow suit. We're already on the way.

"…It would destroy the pillars on which Europe was built—its nations. It would convert Europe into one multicultural space, in which national identities would be fused and sovereignty abandoned. It would coerce ancient European nations to merge into the ultimate artificial state. As George Orwell remarked, it is characteristic of intellectuals to pass over in incomprehension the dominant political passion of the age. Today, that passion is the search for nation identity. And this is the moment when European ruling elites are seeking to destroy the identity of every European nation."

Alan: Here's the question that follows:

"How is it that the peoples of twelve European nations have agreed to this?"

Alan: Here is Sir James Goldsmith's answer.

"The European…"

Alan: This is a man who was involved in setting up—now listen to what he says.

"The European Union was built in secret: not through carelessness of casualness, but in a deliberately planned and skillfully executed manner."

Alan: That's right from the horse's mouth.

"…Claude Cheysson, the former French Minister of Foreign Affairs and a member of the European Commission from 1985 to 1989 described the mechanism in an interview in Le Figaro on 7 May 1994. He explained proudly that the European Union could only have been constructed in the absence of democracy…"

Alan: I'll say that again for the hard of hearing and the hard of thinking.

"He explained proudly that the European Union could only have been constructed in the absence of democracy, and he went on to suggest that the present problems were the result of having mistakenly allowed a public debate on the merits of the Treaty of Maastricht."

Alan: It leaked out into the public and they had a debate on it; and that was a mistake according to them, it should have been kept secret.

"The British newspaper the Guardian lodged a case before the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg complaining of the secrecy in which European decisions are taken. Lawyers for the European Council of Ministers responded by stating to the judges that 'there is no principle of community law which gives citizens the right to EU documents.'…"

Alan: The average citizen is not allowed to have access to any of the European Commission’s or Union’s documents. This is total fascism.

"They went on to make the astounding claim that although heads of government had repeatedly called for more openness in EU affairs, their declarations 'were of an eminently political nature and not binding on the community institutions.' So they asked the judges to ignore the repeated declarations at EU summit meetings in the past two years in favour of greater openness. Statements by the twelve heads of government were no more than 'policy orientations' and had no binding effect."

Alan: So you have no say once you’re taken over into this big conglomerate. That's all it is, a corporate conglomerate, a fascist system. You have no say whatsoever into anything. You can't even get a hold of the records or anything they're doing in secret.

He goes on to say:

"This belief that the nomenklatura knows best and that the public is no more than a hindrance explains why there now exists a profound and dangerous divorce between European societies and their governing elites."

Alan: This is from a guy who is one of the elites. He doesn't mind saying it and he calls them the governing elites.

He says:

"What was done in secret?"

Alan: That was the question. Here's the answer.

"Quietly and progressively, power was transferred to the seventeen unelected technocrats…"

Alan: A technocrat is someone who has been involved in politics and often they're unelected. They're appointed. We all have these characters at the high positions.

"…technocrats who were the members of the European Commission. Originally, power had been entrusted to the Council of Ministers, which consists of the elected national heads of state or their representatives. As they were more interested in national policies than in the creation of Europe, bit by bit the technocrats of the Commission were allowed to take over executive power."

Alan: He says they were allowed to take over executive power. He's telling you that there's a higher authority that selects these characters and puts them in placements in those positions.

"They have been granted the monopoly right to propose new initiatives for the development of the European Union. Their ambition is not modest. Jacques Delors, the outgoing president of the Commission, declared that in future 80 percent of all laws governing economic, social and fiscal affairs of each European nation would originate in Brussels and therefore from proposals initiated by the Commission. As was certain to be the case, this rush towards technocratic hypercentralization has created a Europe which is hopelessly weak externally and unable to influence the course of world events. Internally, the power of the technocracy is employed to destroy sovereignty, freedom and self-reliance."

Alan: And he's asked:

"How do you define a technocrat?"

Alan: He says:

"Usually a technocrat is an ex-politician or a civil servant. He is unelected, virtually impossible to dislodge during his term of employment, and has been granted extensive executive and even legislative power without popular mandate and without being directly answerable to the people whose interests, theoretically, he is supposed to represent."

Alan: That is from Sir James Goldsmith, very good book called "The Trap", worth reading. You can get it pretty cheap I'm sure on Amazon or somewhere. That's from one of the guys who made a speech at the U.S. Senate, one of the best speeches ever, over an hour long warning them of all the pitfalls. What would happen to the people of the U.S. and Canada, Latin America if they amalgamated and copied the European Union. What he didn't mention of course was that The Council on Foreign Relations and The Royal Institute for International Affairs was set-up a long time ago; 100 years ago pretty well was set-up exactly to do this, to turn the world into a three-part trading bloc and they placed their members. They put in the technocrats at the heads of all these big organizations who worked diligently their whole lives long towards the amalgamation process. The big foundations back them up. In fact many of the foundations train them and put them out there. They're unelected and we have never had really democracy. We simply live one long business plan because that's what the world is, a long, long business plan.

Once again, this goes all the way back, we can trace it through history. You can find people like John Dee who was an advisor at the court of Queen Elizabeth I. He was also a spy for Queen Elizabeth I on his foreign tours of Europe, and his designation was 007 by the way. John Dee wrote about the "Brytish Empire” he called it, and how it would be based on free trade. Those who would join get special grants and be given "most privileged nation" trading status - a term that was given to China just before Britain handed Hong Kong back to China. And on it goes; big business plan. I’ll be back after the following messages.

"Everybody Knows" by Leonard Cohen

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix, just bringing you up to speed on past events which helped shape this future that we now live in, the present that we now live in and the future, and how they've trained scientifically (scientific indoctrination) whole masses of people; whole nations of people to go out and play like little children and gorge themselves on entertainment and have fun while they're steamrolling ahead with this incredible totalitarian plan of theirs. People are oblivious to what's going on. They're just like little children and that's what socialism is. Socialism is perpetual childhood, where big brother or big daddy, really, because that's what we have today; big daddy the bringer of all good things is in charge and he and his buddies will decide how to take care of all of your problems for you. That's how we've been trained. These people who come out of special wombs, not like the rest of us commoners, are somehow better fitted to stay in charge and fit it all for you. You have weighty problems, things which you'd never understand, so just go out and play. That's what it's all about.

While they're doing that, they've been having wars all over the world for over 50 years. Truman in 1950 had a meeting with the top members of Congress and they had decided that the U.S. economy prior to World War II was only relieved because of World War II. That's what pulled America out of the Depression. It pulled Britain out as well and most of the European countries. The Depression was caused primarily by the failure of some German banks because the German nation is supposed to keep forking out money from World War I to all the victors, forking out money eternally and keeping their people in a state of utter depression and poverty.

World War II came along, it was inevitable, all the signers of the agreements during World War I knew that. Germany had no option but to go under and starve to death, or fight their way out of it, so along comes World War II, a predicted event, helped and financed by the way from the West as always, because the big corporations who are part of the fascist war machine were all involved in the creation of I.G. Farben that was the war machine. That was the war industry for Germany and that pulled the U.S. and other countries out of the war, then borrow like crazy on their great-great grandchildren's backs, because that's how you pay back compound interest intergenerationally.

In 1950, Truman and the rest of them realized that without war, America could go back into a slump since over half of its economy is derived from production for war. Therefore, they began to have wars on everything and they got heavily involved in wars all over Latin America to make sure that the system that they foresaw – remember the plan again was to make a world society under The Council on Foreign Relations, this socialist controlled society. They could only bring it about by having constant continual wars all over the world and eliminate competition; and being good fascists and corporate fascists, that's what corporations do. You eliminate the competition and that also meant peoples who would arise demanding their rights, their freedoms and better working conditions or money or even the right to some property to live on. That's why they were all over Latin America calling them communists and killing them, whole villages of them for 50-odd years and then all over the world; and voila! in the absence of the Cold War, when the Berlin Wall goes down, Margaret Thatcher gives a speech saying that the next major wars will take place in the Middle East against these "radical fundamentalists" she called them, but she also broadened that to include all fundamental religious types, so people back in the U.S. should think about that.

They knew it was coming. You've got to have a war on the go somewhere, sometime or all the time. Right now, as we're going through all of this practice for general takeover of the military and police and all the civilian agencies, Operation TOPOFF et cetera, we're seeing this is not just nationwide. This is happening in different countries across the world. All these agencies, civilian agencies and emergency management agencies are now pulling off their little stunts to see how well they can communicate with each other. How they can direct traffic flows. How they can get the public to cooperate with them. They're even letting off some smoke fumes, big fumes to simulate dirty bombs; and what they've told the public is this is to watch which way the wind blows it to see what the coverage area would be. Well, how on earth would they know which way the wind is going to go when the real thing happened?

It's all to get us used to an idea there's a war going on, you see, because they must have a war for controlling us; and fascists don't know any other way to run a system but by, as I say, the iron fist on the public – the public being just animals to be led to the slaughter eventually.

There's a book out called "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler" written by Anthony C. Sutton, who was not a conspiracy freak. He was born in London, educated at the University of London in Goettingen and California. He became a citizen of the United States. He came from Britain. He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institute for War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford, California from 1968 to 1973. Now I'll be back after the following message with more information on his books, well worth reading.

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. I'm talking about Professor Anthony Sutton, a man who was a research fellow at the Hoover Institution for War; Revolution and Peace at Stanford, California from '68 to '73. This man wrote a series of books going into who financed the Soviet system, the Bolshevik Revolution and Hitler; and lo and behold, we find the same big institutions, the big foundations and the same big corporations. This book I'm going to read a little bit from is called "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler," very revealing book, so much of it is revealing. It's hard to pick a page from, there's so much there.

This is from page 120 and it ties in with the Great Depression I was talking about that we all pulled out of because World War II came along and countries could suddenly order billions from the international bankers.

He says:

"Roosevelt's New Deal and Hitler's New Order…"

Alan: Hitler called it the New World Order and they simply called it the New Deal in the U.S. That's what it really meant, that little Masonic term, the New Deal.

He says:

"Hjalmar Schacht…"

Alan: Hjalmar Schacht was a big banking company as well.

"…challenged his post-war Nuremburg interrogators with the observation that Hitler's New Order program was the same as Roosevelt's New Deal program in the United States."

Alan: Now there's quite the comment that came out of the Nuremberg trials.

"The interrogators understandably snorted and rejected the observation. However, a little research suggests that not only are the two programs quite similar in content, but that Germans had no trouble in observing the similarities. There is in the Roosevelt Library a small book presented to FDR by Dr. Helmut Magers in December 1933. On the flyleaf of this presentation copyis written the inscription,

To the President of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, in profound admiration of his conception of a new economic order and with devotion for his personality. The author, Baden, Germany, November 9, 1933."

Alan: Here's FDR's reply to this admiration for his new economic order:

(Washington) December 19, 1933

My dear Dr. Magers: I want to send you my thanks for the copy of your little book about me and the "New Deal." Though, as you know, I went to school in Germany…"

Alan: Ah, ha.

"…and could speak German with considerable fluency at one time, I am reading your book not only with great interest but because it will help my German. Very sincerely yours, FDR

"The New Deal or the "new economic order" was not a creature of classical liberalism. It was a creature of corporate socialism."

Alan: Same as Germany. Same as Britain had in fact.

"Big business as reflected in Wall Street strived for a state order in which they could control industry and eliminate competition, and this was the heart of FDR's New Deal. General Electric, for example, is prominent in both Nazi Germany and the New Deal."

Alan: The U.S. system.

"…German General Electric was a prominent financier of Hitler and the Nazi Party, and A.E.G. also financed Hitler both directly and indirectly through Osram. International General Electric in New York was a major participant in the ownership and direction of both A.E.G. and Osram."

Alan: That's the German General Electric.

"…Gerard Swope, Owen Young, and A. Baldwin of General Electric in the United States were directors of the German firm A.E.G. However, the story does not stop at General Electric and financing of Hitler in 1933. In a previous book, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, the author identified the role of General Electric in the Bolshevik Revolution and the geographic location of American participants as at…"

Alan: Listen to this.

"…120 Broadway, New York City; the executive offices of General Electric were also at 120 Broadway. When Franklin Delano Roosevelt was working in Wall Street, his address was also 120 Broadway. In fact, Georgia Warm Springs Foundation, the FDR Foundation, was located at 120 Broadway. The prominent financial backer of an early Roosevelt Wall Street venture from 120 Broadway was Gerard Swope of General Electric. And it was "Swope's Plan" that became Roosevelt's New Deal — the fascist plan that Herbert Hoover was unwilling to foist on the United States. In brief, both Hitler's New Order and Roosevelt's New Deal were backed by the same industrialists and in content were quite similar — i.e., they were both plans for a corporate state."

Alan: Corporate state, folks, that's what you live under and it's very evident. The left wing and the right wing, they're both wings that belong to the same bird and the bird is corporate fascism. Interwoven families on the left and the right at the top – so which bunch of multimillionaires do you want to vote for?

He goes on to say:

"There were then both corporate and individual bridges between FDR's America and Hitler's Germany. The first bridge was the American I.G. Farben…"

Alan: Big umbrella corporation.

"…American affiliate of I.G. Farben, the largest German corporation. On the board of American I.G…."

Alan: Because we had them in the states too you see.

"…sat Paul Warburg, of the Bank of Manhattan and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The second bridge was between International General Electric, a wholly owned subsidiary of General Electric Company and its partly owned affiliate in Germany, A.E.G. Gerard Swope, who formulated FDR's New Deal, was chairman of I.G.E. and on the board of A.E.G. The third "bridge" was between Standard Oil of New Jersey…"

Alan: That's the Rockefellers.

"…and Vacuum Oil and its wholly owned German subsidiary, Deutsche-Amerikanisehe Gesellschaft. The chairman of Standard Oil of New Jersey was Walter Teagle, of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. He was a trustee of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Georgia Warm Springs Foundation and appointed by FDR to a key administrative post in the National Recovery Administration. These corporations were deeply involved in both the promotion of Roosevelt's New Deal and the construction of the military power of Nazi Germany. Putzi Hanfstaengl's role in the early days, up to the mid-1930s anyway, was an informal link between the Nazi elite and the White House. After the mid-1930s, when the world was set on the course for war, Putzis importance declined — while American Big Business continued to be represented through such intermediaries as Baron Kurt von Schroder attorney Westrick, and membership in Himmler's Circle of Friends."

Alan: This is a fascinating book; he has all the data and the proof in the back. It's just astounding to realize that something that I always knew really that the countries that went into fight supposedly national socialism and won, supposedly, came out of it as national socialist countries because the governments had taken over massive rights to rule farmers and all the infrastructure of the nation. Britain was the same. I used to laugh at Winston Churchill's replays of his old speeches when he told the British public to go off and fight to retain their way of life and their system, their ancient cherished system – while his own secretary released a book called "The Fringes of Power" and admitted that in his own particular peer class he was celebrating the fact that out of this war in Europe would come a united Europe, the dream that they'd had for ages. So we're all conned down the river, all of us and all those poor guys that go off to all these wars to fight for this socialist order never really figure it out afterwards. They're too proud of having done their bit. They can't see the big picture and they don't see where it's all going.

There's no doubt about it, even with Cecil Rhodes who started up the Cecil Rhodes Society that was meant to take over all the corporate interests and minerals rights of the world, coupled with Lord Alfred Milner's group, The Round Table Society, eventually merged together with Cecil Rhodes and became the League of Nations and then it became the United Nations. They had it all planned then, to bring in this world socialist state, a state run by the fascists at the top, those who deemed themselves worthy of ruling the lessers and also the commoners would be run with masses of bureaucracies in a communistic fashion: The marriage of fascism and communism. That's what it's all about. The right and the left come together, planned 100-odd years ago, probably longer actually. At least the records that we now get access to are 100 years old.

That's what Alvin Toffler's book "The Third Wave" is all about, the coming together of the two systems. If you want to read Gorbachev's speech to the politburo, look up the Toronto Sun. Go back in its records and check Eric Margolis' write up on Gorbachev's last speech to them because he says to them "you'll hear that communism is dead. Don't believe it. We're simply moving into the next phase."

What does he mean by that? Go back in the writings of Lenin. Lenin said the dictatorship will last about 70 years and then we shall merge into the West. The system that will come out of it will be not quite capitalist and quite socialist. What he's talking about is this new – it's actually global socialism, a globalist fascist system at the top running the whole kit-and-caboodle. That's what it's all about and they have written about it, the big players wrote about it. They just haven't taught it in school. They've kept us all in the dark. They've taught everyone to be nice little social citizens, have a group-think, talk about what's on television and just play ourselves forever and purr like cats that have been fed and well stroked. That's how we've been trained.

This is what Aldous Huxley talked about, the methods into the Brave New World with his book that came out after it, which was "Brave New World Revisited". He was quite confident that through a scientific means and scientific education all of their plans could be brought about, they could literally scientifically train billions of people across the planet not to notice the direction in which they were going. We could be trained to believe that everything that happens scientifically and where science would take us was all quite natural, by simply putting it out in front of us. Putting it into movies to make it exciting and we'd all go along with it and unfortunately, so far it's worked. He also talked about the ultimate destruction of the last vestige of the family unit, especially between male and female.

Now you have new redefined families of all kinds. They've been very successful with that too. Men really have been neutered and they're not men anymore. They sit and adopt the image that's given to them by television and pushed by the culture at the top. They pretend they just love sports and think about nothing else, swig beer and keep their mouths shut, because, after all, all the comedies say that they're dumb stupid creatures that are kept around as pets by the women who actually stay with them. That's what they've adopted. They've adopted a role projected by the media and the entertainment business and unfortunately, the marriage system is almost kaput.

You destroy the family unit. You then separate the child from the family and as Lord Bertrand Russell said that we always believed we've have to eventually take away the children all together at birth from their mothers and never allow them to know who their parents were, in order to recondition them into a brand new system. But by using experimental schools, he said, we found that through scientific indoctrination at kindergarten the parental influence won't work on the child. It will just bounce off the child. The scientific indoctrination will be stronger. Well, lo and behold, that's happened too. A couple of years ago when there was a strike of daycare workers in Ontario, maybe other parts of Canada, the women were in the streets with plaquards demanding that big brother, you know the big daddy there, the government, takes care of this for them. So here you have them demanding the very thing that the elitists wanted a long time ago. The mothers are demanding that the state take care of their children for them to get all this going because they had to get to work. When they split up the family unit, it was not because they liked women. They don't like women at all. It was to double the tax base, for one, and to destroy the family unit, number two, and so there was no one at home to have parental influence over the child. They might give them “contaminated ideas,” and that's the terms they use at the top. Contamination of ideas must not be passed on, meaning old fashioned values.

For those who’ve grown up watching all of this, it’s been quite the study. Quite the study to understand it, to read about it and watch it being introduced so slickly that those who are targeted won't know they're targeted. They just go along with it thinking that government is so wonderful and cares about them. They believe all these pithy little speeches that are made and they soak it up and now they demand the state takes care of their children for them. Whose child is it anyway? they say.

A few years ago the United Nations came out with the laws of the child or the rights of the child; and, being good creatures that we are, no one complains because it sounds good. That's the fuzzy language they use, because we like children, children are nice, so children should have rights. It wasn't until it was all passed and put through, as always, when people looked into it they found it had nothing to do with what they thought it did. They found out that the child had all the rights and the parents had none. That's by the state itself. That's how these things are put through. They fool us at every single turn and very few people realize it. Now, as I say, almost the whole world are doing these little fairly quiet emergency preparedness exercises because they must terrify the whole world into giving up the last vestiges of their rights to go into a controlled, dictated, dictatorial society. That's what all of this is about.

When they contained the Iron Curtain and had the ring around Russia, the Soviet system, Stalin had to find enemies within because really there were no more enemies without; and to maintain power in that kind of system you just create enemies, so they were looking for terrorists across – or, you know, they're looking for bluebloods under every bed. In the West, they were looking for “Reds under the bed.” That was the term they used at the time. You always find enemies within.

Now, with this rush towards mandatory psychological evaluation, lifelong, ongoing, they're going to find out that oh, gee, so many people are actually terrorists and didn't know it. That's how it's going to be portrayed on the media. They'll probably have a new social work department to rehabilitate you into right-think from wrong-think and all of this kind of stuff. That's the kind of world we're going through right now while the media is giving us utter trivia. Utter tripe and trivia and they've even resurrected O.J. Simpson again just to keep us preoccupied with the rubbishy trivia. They're also going on about this guy Obama or whatever his name is that’s going to run for the democrats, went on about him being related to Cheney. Well, who cares? Eighth cousin removed apparently, but why not keep it all in the family? They always did. I'll be back after the following messages.

"Everybody Knows" by Leonard Cohen

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed
Everybody knows the war is over
Everybody knows the good guys lost

Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix. Now I think we have a caller still on the line. Is it Don from Oregon, are you there?

Don: Yes sir. Alan I'm here and you are speaking well and in good form tonight and I appreciate your efforts. I just wanted to read a few things to further corroborate what you're saying. It's a page out of Bouvier's Law Dictionary of 1914. I'll read the first paragraph if it's okay.

Alan: Sure. Go ahead.

Don: This is about the Potter Familias, in civil Roman law this was a position in order to give a correct idea of what was understood in the Roman law by this term Potter Familias, it is a proper to refer briefly to the artificial organization of the Roman family.

I'll say that again. "The artificial organization of the Roman family, the greatest moral phenomena in the history of the human race. The comprehensive term Potter or Familia embraces both persons and property, money, land, houses, slaves, children, all constitute part of this artificial family."

Alan: That's correct.

Don: This [Judicur] entity, the legal [petrome] family. This, which was inclusive, vested in a chief or Potter Familias who alone was and who belongs to himself was [inaudible] in Roman law that far back.

Alan: They use the symbol of the fasci [fasces] as well. If you look at the Congressional Hall when they give their speeches either side of the president, and right on the left you see the fasci standing up right there. The U.S. was created on the fascist system.

Don: Yes. State is just another word for condition, so it's an artificial condition.

Alan: The Founding Fathers stated that they were going to copy their system on Rome. It was the best one they could find. That's right and you wonder why all those symbols are there. There's the fasci in the Congressional Hall on either side of those people. The corporate interests have run the United States since its foundation, not the people's rights and interests but the corporation’s. They run the economy and when you realize that, your economy is actually the entity that gives you all of your laws. If you kill someone they put you away. It's not because you killed someone. It's because you took a taxpayer out of the system. That's why you're going to get punished.

Don: It's all based on commerce. A friend of mine amply stated one time that "commerce is war masquerading as peace."

Alan: That's what we're in today. We're in one of the biggest wars ever and the last leg of their journey. Thanks for calling. For Hamish and myself, up here in Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your god or gods go with you.

(Transcribed by Linda)