February 4, 2008 (#71)




Poem Copyright Alan Watt February 4, 2008:





© Alan Watt February 4, 2008


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - February 4, 2008 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes and Callers' Comments)








"Code of Silence" by Bruce Springsteen


There's a code of silence that we don't dare speak
There's a wall between us and a river so deep
And we keep pretending that there's nothing wrong
But there's a code of silence and it can't go on


Is the truth so elusive, so elusive as you can see
that it ain't enough baby
To bridge the distance between you and me
There's a list of grievance 100 miles long
There's a code of silence and it can't go on



Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on February 4th, 2008. People who email me, the newcomers, I always tell them to go into the website rather than just email the questions. Go into the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com and download as many talks as you wish. You'll find I always scatter the information through all the different talks because everything in a way is scattered and yet it's interrelated. All knowledge is really interrelated. You don't get a complete story from A to Z on any particular item in history. It’s always scattered all over the globe basically and all over the past.


Look into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you can download transcripts in the various languages of Europe and print them up and pass them around to your friends. I get email all the time from people – generally, again, people who have been listening for a few months or who are just catching on that something's happening or been happening and getting wilder as the weeks roll by, to do with security and it's making everyone nervous. I tell them don't panic and don't just download yourself with lots of data trying to catch up quickly. You have to take your time and absorb what you can manage at the time or you'll freak out and break down, and don't take all this stuff you're getting and then pass it around to your friends hoping they're going to understand because you've got to be selective as to who you try and spend your time with, because that's what it's all about is teaching maybe a few people. They used to say in the days of Plato if you manage to change the lives of five people in your entire lifetime by what you knew, you had really exceeded and done very well; and it's no different today when you're doing it verbally on a one-to-one communication basis.


Most people, even when they think they're waking up, are really looking for some answer to keep the system that they have been brought up in and they're used to. They trying to keep that system the same, just as it is now in my life, and they don't realize that part of the system was just an upgrade done by the big boys for a particular time. The upgrade we're going through now is for the next time, the time to come, because we live in a long-range business plan. That's how the world is arranged.


It's no secret if you go back into the old history books and read all of the people involved in the setting up of the League of Nations, which eventually transformed into the United Nations. Read what they had to say and read too about what the problems that they foresaw would be and the ways to overcome those problems and some of them even suggested having another world war after World War I. They called World War I the Great War, the Great War and eventually renamed it World War I. I'll be back with more on this particular topic after these messages.



Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix, going over some of the problems that people will run into when they try and pass on information to other people.  I was talking about the League of Nations and the problems they foresaw in achieving their goal to a global system – a system that had already been talked about for over 100 years when the League of Nations was formed. Karl Marx talked about it and other social revolutionaries talked about it and these characters were generally journalists who were paid and promoted by the big foundations that had already arisen.


The foundations themselves were run by the rich men of the world. They were also working in collusion with the big Royal families of Europe because they all had charters at that time to actually exist. They've had a license to exist as a big foundation and they had Royal Charters. A Royal Charter really is above government or parliament because in Europe really, especially in England, royalty is still a separate form of government—no matter what they try and tell you. Everything that's passed in parliament has to be eventually signed by royalty to be law.


And with the League of Nations they wondered if more wars would be necessary after the first one to bring society to its knees so they could bring in this new world system. The world system was still to be based on a mixture of Darwinism and socialism brought together. Now Darwinism is still based on survival of the fittest and these big great movements that came along in the 20th century and had revolutions, whether it was Natziism or communism or the Mussolini version of socialism, still fascism, they were all pretty well the same. They came out of this great idea of (they called it) "the Natural Aristocracy" running the world, the intelligentsia. The intelligentsia would still take commands from the royalty, those already ruling, and the rich men of the world, those who already owned the commerce and the means of the production of the world; and that in itself is quite a story because we take so much for granted. We don't think. Very few people think through any particular thing that exists in their lifetime when you're born into it.


For instance, someone somewhere at some time had to say we're going to make gold the most precious item there is, and it would be the ones of course who had discovered this and the ones who already knew where to mine it. It also meant you had power or gained power by introducing it into society, having replaced barter and then running the country because the third man or the middle man always ends up running the other two who are bartering.


And even with diamonds. Who decided that diamonds were precious? Why is it precious?


There's lots of other stones out there, but they actually give it a particular currency or financial value. Outside of industry, really, it's only used for show, but the show is often worn around ladies during weddings and so on of big powerful families and supposedly they could buy and sell countries with these jewels and in essence they still do. They buy and sell countries because it's the same boys who run commerce who run the particular diamond industry. The history of Africa has been one of incredible exploitation that's still ongoing because the royalty of Britain let Mr. Cecil Rhodes take over South Africa at one point (he created Rhodesia), started a war with the Boers there and the whole idea this movement out of Oxford, England, was to take over the world's wealth and resources.


That has never stopped and the Africans have been exploited ever since for their wealth and their minerals, but they don't get much in return for this wealth – the stuff that goes on auction at Sotheby's and other places. "Big rocks," as they're called, have been bought really with incredible lives because revolutions are often funded by the big diamond and gold companies so that companies can get in there and do the digging. After all, the people there who are living on the surface are not using the land. That's what the big companies will tell you to justify their actions and this is called regular trade practice: the hiring of mercenaries, fomenting revolutions, putting in your own puppet men and giving them a cut of the loot while you enslave the public to work for them.


We don't live in a nice world. This is not a nice place to be. It's a place where something that's called greed or avarice seems to be running the whole show. Now what is greed? Ask the person what greed is and the greedy person will never say it's greed. They'll try and rationalize it; but outside your natural wants, then really anything on surplus is really greed, yet this system is called a natural system because it exists while we're born. We adapt into it. We're trained to work within it and we're trained as well that anyone can get to the top in this system, and that's impossible since there's only one chair at the top for every particular department that you fancy going into. That means there's a lot of people at the bottom don't even get over the first level of bricks, so it's not a humane system. It's an aberrant system, an aberrant system created obviously by aberrant people an awful long time ago, and that is what some people today have concluded who have written about psychopathy.


The psychopath is technically the same as everyone else physically, but there's an anomaly within their brain or their mind somewhere. They have no conscience but they do like to acquire and often they acquire simply for power's sake. Power itself is a drug to them and having power over others is very important to them. Therefore, it's only natural in a system that encourages success, which means you have more of the paper or the gold or the diamonds or whatever the currency is than anyone else, then you're very successful, even at the expense of everyone else. Then you're classified as successful. That's a deviant system because having overabundance – stuff, money or wealth of any kind that you could never use in your own lifetime or even pass on to a family. You could pass it on to thousands of families.


There's something aberrant about that need to have that much. They accrue and accrue and accrue, so naturally they are the power structure in the system because this entire system is theirs. The commercialized system, the Pavlovian 'work for your reward' system is theirs. They run the world's commerce. They run the stock exchanges. Not too many of them have to get into the stock exchange everyday and they do, the same ones over and over, and they'll put 20 to $40 billion in each and make incredible sums of money on interest as the money is flipped across the globe when banks close for the night and other ones open in other countries. They decide which countries will be lifted or maintained or which ones will fall, not too many people, and we are taught to believe this is all quite natural.


No one truly, even the economists, can completely explain how the stock exchange works. They can't do it. Years ago on the BBC there was a documentary on the fallacies of economics and some of them called it the myths of economics and a few people, a few professors who had left the whole school of economics, were discussing its bogusness. It was completely fake. It was more of a theoretical religion than any actual science and that's true enough. It's not meant to be understood by the general public. It's meant to sound so incredibly complicated that we better leave it to the experts, who happen to have the longest teeth because they're the wolves. That's how simple it is to run this kind of system and those families, those extremely rich, rich people, run whole countries through the institutions of those countries.


Institutions, remember, become part of your culture. They do create policies, the things that you think or you take for granted, even the big banking institutions. They will say "it's something that society needs. We fill a function and a service," but it's more than just a private business. It's a supposed societal necessity but they all work for the same people really, those who own the system. You have the very, very old families especially in the U.S. who came over from Europe and England and they're still running the country today.


Meanwhile, the same people give us the fake system to believe in, which is some big concept called "democracy" where you're allowed to vote for people. That's the only right you have under democracy is the right to vote. You don't have the right to demand that you kick out politicians when they fail to come up with all the promises. That's never been done, never will be done, because the whole thing is a fraud. I'll be back with more after the following messages.



Hi folks. Alan Watt back with Cutting Through the Matrix and trying to show you that the problems we face aren't simply a matter of getting anything back. It's not just a matter of maintaining that which we think we have, but it's a matter of thinking out a completely different system altogether because this one will never be given to the public; never ever. The public now have become the problem. The population of the earth now is the problem of those who run the world, the sciences, the economy, and they've decided they don't need us all, at least the quantities they've had in the past. Since they themselves with their own sciences know the destruction they can wreak and havoc they can put out there, they don't want to have massive world wars like they had before because they don't want to perish. However, they know that they've got to bring a global system in so that there's no more threat of war and they must then have everyone monitored as they bring the population down so that they don't have internal strife within, although they must use terrorism as a reason for keeping control over the populace.


It's all to do with control. The elite have always controlled the populace, but now in a global society, since they must maintain power and control and you must need government, then they must have a threat. The threat will be you. You are the terrorist and you'll have thought crimes and all kinds of crimes and there'll be new kinds of confession, probably to computers that will read your mind. That's where it's all coming down to. We can't get justice by simply asking for it. We have to work towards it and any justice in the past, the little parts that we gained once in a while and lost quite easily, were always done by working hard towards it.


Now we've got Vic from it says Babylon here. I guess that's New York, is it?


Vic:  Alan?


Alan:  Yes.


Vic:  Pleasure to meet you.


Alan:  How are you?


Vic:  I'm lovely. At the end of 2001 the man wins. I know it's an allegory for the next age – the next age we're robots, so why doesn't IBM win? 


Alan:  IBM is the eye-beam. The beam from the eye, the big eye, and IBM is just HAL as well, H-A-L (one letter behind it).


Vic:  Right, but that plan is that they're going to win, so why is it that the man gets to be God?


Alan:  Well, they are gods as far as they're concerned at the top. They've always believed that in the higher religions. People who read even any of the standard orthodox religions that can understand and they have a background and the histories of them, they will see that. It's written. It's carefully hidden within them all for the small few.


Vic:  I'm just curious why it was the reverse in the movie. Why would they let the man conquer the computer?


Alan:  Well, man has not conquered the computer. I mean which man are you talking about?


Vic:  The guy in the movie, he defeats Hal, he kills him and becomes a god. But if they're going to win they're going to be gods, we lose, so why did they let that happen in the movie?


Alan:  It will happen in the movie if you allow yourself to go into a digitalized computerized matrix, which is coming. It's the interfacing, so once you get into that interface you're not in charge of the programs or the language or anything else in that computer. The whole trick is not to allow yourself to be enticed into it because the road to hell is very enticing and it will be made very enticing to interface with computers and be in a virtual reality, so don't go into it. That's the warning right now. Those who do are gone.


Vic:  Interesting. I have a friend that used to be the mayor of a major city. Does that mean he could be in the dark about any of this and if so would he help anybody if he knew or is he definitely masonically connected?


Alan:  He would be masonically connected and he would follow orders.


Vic:  And if he knew the whole agenda?


Alan:  I doubt he'd know the whole agenda at the mayor's level.


Vic:  So I mean if he were awakened to that fact do you think he would do anything to help people or would he break his orders?


Alan:  He would stick by his own particular clique. They always do. It's the old school tie and all the rest of it. They'll stick by their own particular clique or lodge. Guys have always joined these particular groups down through history always for their own purposes of basically benefiting themselves. He will stand by himself in what suits him and rewards him rather than society, I would presume.


Vic:  That's what I was scared of. Where can I go to get those UN documents because I need something concrete so that I can show people so I can get my family the hell out of here?


Alan:  You'll have to go into – even start off with the Earth Charter. Just start off with the Earth Charter.


Vic:  Okay. Where do you get that?


Alan:  You can get that on the internet there. It's the UN Earth Charter. Now Maurice Strong was the front man that was put forward. He's a Rockefeller boy and he was put forward to give it to the public. The Rockefeller's drafted it up and the Rockefeller's are amongst the biggest bankers on the planet and here they are telling you about this wonderful society they're going to bring in and how they're going to do it and how we're one big global village et cetera, et cetera. The trick of the wolf has always been to convince the sheep that their interests lay in the same direction and it starts off with the standard thing. Read right through it and you'll see little bits about politics there about populations. They don't quite say control; they'll say "bringing under acceptable limits" and all this kind of stuff. Look at the whole evolution thing too. They keep saying "evolution" because that's their religion as well.


Vic:  If you just Google Earth Charter you can find it?


Alan:  You'll bring it up, yes. Thanks for calling. I'll be back with more after these messages. Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Just to follow-up on the last caller there, Microsoft has announced it has a couple of departments working on an interfacing. Now whenever they announce something it's been done a long time ago. They might have someone at a lower level going over the same stuff again, but they have little gizmos you can put on your head and these things send ultrasonic messages into your brain. They can read your brain. They can understand you. In other words, the computer will then start to read what you want and anticipate your moods and all the rest of it and your moves. Eventually this is to go into interfacing and it's all to get you ready for what they already have, and have had for a while, and that's a chip right in your brain, but you've got to get used to this step first you see.


They don't want to bring out the end product right away, it will frighten you, so they've got to get you used to it and used to it until you actually see pictures in your mind itself. You won't need a screen eventually. It will work directly in the occipital lobe of your skull where all the optic nerves come back to (that's optic region for your eyes), and you'll hear the sounds in your temporal lobes as well, at least one of them, where your sound is located for the ears. That's all ready to go, but they've got to just get you ready for one mouse trap to the next mouse trap to the next mouse trap, until it's a done deal and we'll all walk into it like sheep going from one field to the next, until we're in the slaughter house. That's how simple it is.


You just train them intergenerationally and we're on a roll now. They don't even need one whole generation. One generation used to be 70 years. Now they can update us so quickly when there's no normalcy to hang on to, we've nothing to compare anything to, and they can steamroll ahead and we do. We steamroll ahead with them, like a stampede, gobbling up all this technology without questioning where it's going or what's the intent of those who gave it to us.


Remember, the military-industrial complex were in charge of this before they gave it to the public. They never do anything to free you. That's not what militaries are there for.


Now I've got Harley from Michigan. Are you there, Harley?


Harley:  Yes. Good evening Alan. How are you this evening?


Alan:  Not so bad.


Harley:  Good. I want to say real quick I did receive your books and I tell you what I'm halfway through and very well put how you put it together. The books are very, very good and very informative. I wanted to tell you that first and foremost. My question is, I wanted to go back to what you were talking about and when you're talking about business and I was telling a friend today that businesses are inhumane. It's an inhumane thing to do business and I said to him that if you look back at when Abraham Lincoln so-called "freed the slaves" it was just to basically tilt the war for the north to win because there was 4 million slaves and the industry in the south was making about I believe somewhere from $2 billion to $4 billion. I said to him you have to go and I did a little bit of research and if I'm not mistaken and maybe you can help me with this, again inhumane business is where I believe J.P. Morgan who helped loan money to the banks in the south for the cotton and the cotton gin and things of that nature, but he also got his money from the Rothschild's from the Bank of England. Am I correct?


Alan:  Yes he did. They were all connected together, these bankers, even Kuhn Loeb & Company that were also involved with the Civil War. Jacob Schiff and all these boys were involved with it. In fact, I think the Kuhn Loeb guys even ran the uniform service and had one dyed blue and the other one gray. I mean these guys ran both sides of everything, but you're quite right. All wars are economic but they're to create social change, like Quigley said, it creates social change, and what you had was almost an industrialized north and a corporate takeover taking over the south.


Harley:  Right, right. And the thing is and I was saying too is if you go back and again way back to the Mayflower society or the first passengers that came on Plymouth Rock. That's interesting they call it a Plymouth Rock. The thing is is that when you go back and you look at the descendents from the Mayflower you will see that they have actors, writers, presidents, major lawyers, senators from their genealogy and again I was explaining to some people that it's all about eugenics. That why I say when you vote – oh, and by the way, I have officially of 2008 will never ever vote for my life because it's crap. It's all crap. It's a façade. It's to make people think you're going to get changes, but there's a DVD I have from Aldous Huxley. He says if you give people enough bread and wine and circus, then you can put any kind of propaganda you want on the TV and they'll go just like trained rats. They'll just go right along with the program.


Alan:  Absolutely, we live on promises and they don't even have to fulfill them anymore and we never learn. They never fulfill them but we never learn. We just vote the next bunch in and it's a circus. It truly is a circus with balloons and funny faces and hats and that's what the public go for. It's quite astounding and it's a distraction because if the public realized that you're under a totalitarian system with very old families as you say. These old families were from – I always wondered why specifically they mentioned the Mayflower and I went into the histories of it and just who exactly these people were, and they were not poor little people at all. They were rather wealthy, very old families even already when they came over and specific breeding and all the rest of it and they still run the U.S. today, so you're quite right on that. 


Harley:  One other thing and I'm going to get off, but I want to leave with a quote from Hillary, or I should say [Hill-Lare], she said in a public speech not too long ago, I believe in California, she said, "are you ready for your blue collar green jobs?" I'm going to hang up and I'll going to let you elaborate on that.


Alan:  I've seen people take up from there, other people, politicians and so on, talking about the creation of green collar jobs to replace the old blue collar jobs. Remember what a collar is in its true form. A collar is something that binds you by the neck. We should remember that. See, there's a lot of esoteric wording that we use everyday in the exoteric form but we don't realize where it comes from, but we have collars and when you're collared you're caught; and people were caught in their jobs, the blue collar workers. They were tied to their machines you might say. Now it's the green collar jobs. You'll be tied to Mother Earth, this whole world agenda where you serve the ecology as well as the economy and that's what's all part of it; it's their little coding. Green even from ancient times was always the secret color of this particular group. It was also the secret color of the Communist Party, their sacred color, not just the red one for revolution; it was green. This is the old nature-worship religion type thing and the belief that those who are the top predators have the right to rule the lessers on the planet. That's what Darwinism was all about. It's a very old religion. Darwin was just part of it and they were espousing it under a scientific term or terminology.


Now we've got Rick from California. Are you there, Rick?


Rick:  Oh yes. Hi Alan. How you doing?


Alan:  Not so bad.


Rick:  I just wanted to make an observation. Pardon me from my jittery voice, I have a form of, what do you call it, autism from the shots and everything, but I noticed that – I just wanted to make an observation that some of the callers who call into the show who say it's the blacks and the Jews are the ones who want to argue with you about Christianity, they're very self-confident and very eloquent in the way they speak. It's almost like they're spring-loaded and they've got an agenda like they're working for somebody.


Alan:  They do have an agenda and there's no doubt about it. I'm always intrigued by how governments run again the people by creating divisions and saying you can't handle yourself so we must do it over you and create these laws to handle all of you because of these different factions. However, when you go into the particular groups that create the dissentions, you'll find that they generally work for the government in some capacity or another as some kind of operative. That's standard procedure.


I don't think people know for instance that Ernst Zundel that came to Canada as a landed immigrant and who single-handedly brought in the hate laws. The hate laws would never have been passed in Canada if it hadn't been for Zundel, who shock to fame over the course of a year or two right up to the Supreme Court of Canada over his supposed questioning of the holocaust. I thought now, he was a landed immigrant and under the Canadian laws they wouldn't even had to have put him in a regular court, never mind put him through that and the Federal courts as well as the Supreme Court of Canada. That was to give the man publicity, so you need the cause to get the effect and he came across – his right-hand man was Grant Bristol. Grant Bristol supposedly was a security guard who had lots of money who gave out the private telephone numbers of very wealthy Jewish people in Toronto and told the skinheads to go and phone them up and harass them, therefore you've got the Jewish people complaining about these skinheads and racists. Grant Bristol was exposed in the Toronto Sun as being a CSIS operative. He worked for the Canadian CIA. He was also Jewish. That was the right-hand man of Ernst Zundel.


Rick:  Some of these callers sound very professional. You know what I mean?Now I wanted to ask you something kind of what I brought up last week. I know that the PEPFAR or the AIDS thing in Uganda that the president is doing is – I know that's its probably a front and I don't believe the propaganda. I guess my question is when you see so much propaganda for it and very little balance, how do you fight something like that without something – without fact or without evidence or where do you get evidence, ammunition to expose it, I guess is what I'm saying?


Alan:  Which actual part of it, though?


Rick:  PEPFAR is the anti-retroviral treatment program in Uganda that the president is accelerating.


Alan:  We do know that the drugs they've got figured out under the United Nations—that's got a nice history of depopulation already with its free tetanus shots that they sterilized a lot of women with—were the ones who advocated this; and personally, I wouldn't trust the UN with anything. However, the drugs they're giving the ones in Africa, and we're all paying for it over here to send them over, are drugs they won't even give to your cancer patients. That's what these drugs were initially designed for, but they were so toxic they killed the people off quicker, so that's what's getting shipped over to Africa.


Rick:  See, I'm helping an independent journalist with website documentation to help him write his papers about the Congo how they killed 10 million in the last 10 years, the U.S. and Israel and England and Russia and all that.


Alan:  Oh yes, because there's diamonds and everything in there and it's big, big business.


Rick:  Also, I wanted to bring up that a lot of the violence in Kenya it turns out there was an agenda behind it. It's actually being orchestra and even read some plans. Somebody borrowed me some plans.


Alan:  People don't realize the European countries were involved in Africa for hundreds of years. They haven't stopped and they went in there to get all the goodies out of Africa and they're still doing it because there's so much wealth and minerals and diamonds and gold in Africa still to be gotten. I mean the world's chromium supply came from there for 50-odd years, so it's incredibly wealthy, but unfortunately for the big boys, there's Africans living on it.


Rick:  I also wanted to make – I feel and I have a suspicion that they want to get rid of Africans because they have some knowledge in their tribal traditions, they have some knowledge of ancient history, advanced civilizations in the past.


Alan:  What they had was the ability to be independent. All independent peoples and they called them "primitive religions" at the top, or "arrested civilizations." Arrested civilizations are those who have made all the tools they need. They don't go into sciences and create bigger and better and newer. They're called arrested civilizations. They were slated to go extinct back in the 1700's when the first major economists that worked for the British government wrote their different essays on them. John Stuart Mill came out with a list of peoples that would have to either adapt or mimic the white man, he called it mimicking, meaning work the same way, or they'd have to perish because they would bring down the superior society if they were allowed to continue. This is a eugenics program of extinction, extermination.


Rick:  Yes. Also, before I hang up, I just wanted to say that I'm reading Plato's Republic right now and it's great. I mean it has everything in there. It's just like you were talking about. It even talks about how the person who knows how to stop disease can secretly introduce it as well.


Alan:  It shows you how much they already understood all that time ago about society, how to control them. You'll see the elitism there with the aristocracy. He was one of them himself and he was quite blunt about the right to rule the lesser peoples and breed them for specific tasks, the commoners, they were called "its."


Rick:  Well thank you very much Alan. I appreciate it.


Alan:  Thanks for calling.


Rick:  All right. Have a nice day.


Alan:  You too. Those civilizations that are completely independent were to be eradicated and in a sense, you see, it's almost the only opposition that the elite ever had were people who were completely independent from the system and didn't need their money. They didn't need their factories to get them steel axes and so on. They could make whatever they needed and that's anathema to them. They can't have that. This world has to have everyone interdependent, which really means completely dependent on your masters who own the "means of production" as they call it themselves. The ones who have all the wealth and own all the things we supposedly need. That's the sad truth of it and they were very open about it from the days of Thomas Malthus onwards that these particular societies, including the American Indian, that could not adapt into an 8 to 5 or whatever length of job they had, into commerce, buying and selling, punctuality, all those things, then they would not be allowed to come through. This is very akin to Hinduism.


In fact, most of this inner religion goes back to Hinduism, the higher esoteric understanding of what some people call "higher Freemasonry" is really a form of Hinduism because they talk about ages, too. You find ages even in the Old Testament, the Book of Job, where they talk about the ages and it talks about the different constellations moving in their travels and dominating and so on. They always used the stars to explain their agenda and you'll find that "there's nothing new under the sun" as they say. They use these ages. The Hindus talked about the waves. They called it "waves," how they rippled through waves of time, and at the end of the final last ripple before it starts again, everything perishes except those who are fittest to come through. All inferiors must perish by law. They can't come through. I'll be back with more after the following messages.


Hi folks. I'm Alan Watt Cutting Through the Matrix and going back to one of the earlier callers who was talking Morgan and other big bankers involved in the machinations of major events within the United States. You couldn't do better than a book that's called "The Robber Barons."  You can get it used. "The Robber Barons," the subtitle is "The Great American Capitalists 1861-1901," by Matthew Josephson. It's an excellent book. It tells you the cons, how they used all the taxes to build their own railroads for nothing. How they paid off various congressmen. How they even brought down a Great Depression before the 1920's in the late 1800's when Gould, Morgan and a few other ones got together and collapsed the banking system while they pocketed all the profits, all by design, and nothing was done about it because these characters are untouchable you see.


As I say, the rich men of the world have the laws written to suit themselves to make sure that they're always kept in the clear. They can't be brought in because they simply have laws passed that allow them to do the kinds of things that they do. It's no different than the terrorist bill or the anti-terrorist bill or whatever they want to call it. You'll find that Bush and all the rest of them had laws made that give them the right to do what they're doing. That's how simple it is when you front for the big money boys. You make laws to suit yourself so that it keeps you in the clear, so you're never really breaking the law. You can't break a law when you've already set it up that you can't break it. You give yourself permission to do that which would have once been illegal at one time. It's very, very simple.


These same characters want to bring in their wonderful interdependent society where we all take on the color green and walk around with flowers in our hair, I guess, and meanwhile they'll control us through all these massive bureaucracies and various enforcement agencies and sterilize us and all the rest of it, because that's on the agenda. They'll go for your children first. Although I noticed in Australia, interestingly, they brought out a gadget out there where they can put a chip and basically plug the man's vas deferens where the sperm comes up in the male; you can plug it and set it off or on remotely to work to block the sperm. Now Australia is hardly overpopulated and I'm sure they're wondering why so much money is going into that kind of research in Australia. Well, you see, China is going to be the dominant nation in that whole area or region as they call it. That was decided long ago with the Institute for Pacific Studies (which is a branch of the Royal Institute for International Affairs) when they set up the trading blocks, Australia is going under the dominant one which is China. China is the model state for the United Nations. They already have their great depopulation program, one child per family, and that's to be the role model for the world, but those in its immediate vicinity which have to come under their jurisdiction will follow suit. That's why Australia is leading the charge for this depopulation idea. That's why also they brought out the one last week to do with "it's a sin to have more than one child in Australia. It's a curse on the environment" et cetera. It's all connected because Australia and New Zealand go under China eventually.


Now from Hamish and myself, up in Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your god or your gods go with you.



(Transcribed by Linda)